Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Liberal nationalism, nationalist liberalization, and democracy: The cases of post-Soviet Estonia and Ukraine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The bulk of scholarly literature views nationalism as harmful to democratic transition. Yet Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan indirectly suggest that nationalism may benefit democratization. This study shows that under the right conditions nationalism can benefit democratic transition. Building on the typology of Linz and Stepan and the liberal nationalism tradition of Yael Tamir and David Miller, this study examines the transitions in Estonia and Ukraine. It introduces an important layer, the multinational federal state, into the typologies developed by Linz and Stepan to show that nationalism can prove a useful political tool of mobilization in a multiethnic setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)623-646
Number of pages24
JournalNationalities Papers
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • History
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Liberal nationalism, nationalist liberalization, and democracy: The cases of post-Soviet Estonia and Ukraine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this