Limits on the number of primordial Scattered disc objects at Pluto mass and higher from the absence of their dynamical signatures on the present-day trans-Neptunian Populations

Andrew Shannon, Rebekah Dawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Today, Pluto and Eris are the largest and most massive Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), respectively. They are believed to be the last remnants of a population of planetesimals that has been reduced by > 99 per cent since the time of its formation. This reduction implies a primordial population of hundreds or thousands of Pluto-mass objects, and a mass-number distribution that could have extended to hundreds of Lunas, dozens of Mars, and several Earths. Such lost protoplanets would have left signatures in the dynamics of the present-day Trans- Neptunian Populations, and we statistically limit their primordial number by considering the survival of ultra-wide binaryTNOs, the Cold ClassicalKuiper belt, and the resonant population. We find that if the primordial mass-number distribution extended to masses greater than Pluto (~ 10-3M⊕), it must have turned downwards to be no more top-heavy than roughly equal mass per log size, a significant deviation from the distribution observed between 10-5M⊕ and 10-3M⊕. We compare these limits to the predicted mass-number distribution of various planetesimal and protoplanet growth models. The limits derived here provide a test for future models of planetesimal formation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1870-1882
Number of pages13
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume480
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Limits on the number of primordial Scattered disc objects at Pluto mass and higher from the absence of their dynamical signatures on the present-day trans-Neptunian Populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this