Abstract
Local ("indigenous') knowledge and conventional ("modern') science are both limited in their abilities to mitigate soil erosion hazard in the Himalaya. Local knowledge primarily responds over the long term and over areas beyond the actual site of soil loss. Conventional science emphasizes erosion control in the short term and on-site. A case study from the Shivalik Hills in India is used to demonstrate these complementarities. The local dialect contains a detailed lexicon for landforms, soils, hydrology, and erosion, suggesting that environmental processes are understood. In the local approach to erosion, land use is altered to maintain biomass productivity. Conventional science seeks to reduce downstream sedimentation by controlling erosion through structural and vegetative techniques. In the Shivaliks, local approaches are complemented by conventional techniques (sediment traps, earthen dams and planting trees and grasses). In the process, productivity has increased and sedimentation has been reduced. -from Authors
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 61-72 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Mountain Research & Development |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1993 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Environmental Chemistry
- Development
- General Environmental Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Local knowledge and conventional soil science approaches to erosional processes in the Shivalik Himalaya'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver