Abstract
Local procedures for carefully selected distal rectal cancer offer significant advantages such as sphincter preservation and avoidance of radical surgery. However, since preoperative selection criteria including current imaging modalities are unable to definitively stage regional lymph node status, local therapies for rectal cancer have the inherent potential disadvantage of undertreating a fraction of patients due to unresected mesorectal/regional lymph node disease. Current available data suggests that the local approach may be appropriate only for carefully selected T1 tumors with favorable pathologic features. Inferior local control and survival reported for T2 tumors and T1 tumors with unfavorable features, despite the addition of chemoradiation, outweigh the advantages of the local approach. Patients with unfavorable tumors who are unable to tolerate radical resection or who refuse surgery may be treated with local excision with or without adjuvant chemoradiation. Other modalities, such as electrocoagulation and endocavitary radiation, may also be valuable in this setting, as well as preoperative chemoradiation followed by local excision. Regardless of the approach used, all patients undergoing local therapy of a rectal cancer require careful long-term follow-up, because these patients remain at significant risk for local recurrence and distant failure.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 967-981 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Surgical Clinics of North America |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2002 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Local therapy for rectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver