Abstract
We comment on a set of papers in this journal issue that have examined three evaluation theories by constructing a logic model for each and conducting a set of comparative content analyses. We consider the set of papers as an instance of research on evaluation. For instance, we question the extent to which linear logic models convey the contingent decision making emphasized by some evaluation theories. We also offer specific comments about the papers’ treatment of one theory, so-called emergent realist evaluation.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 74-76 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Evaluation and Program Planning |
Volume | 38 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2013 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Business and International Management
- Social Psychology
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Strategy and Management
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health