TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term safety and efficacy of garadacimab for preventing hereditary angioedema attacks
T2 - Phase 3 open-label extension study
AU - the VANGUARD Study Group
AU - Reshef, Avner
AU - Hsu, Connie
AU - Katelaris, Constance H.
AU - Li, Philip H.
AU - Magerl, Markus
AU - Yamagami, Keiko
AU - Guilarte, Mar
AU - Keith, Paul K.
AU - Bernstein, Jonathan A.
AU - Lawo, John Philip
AU - Shetty, Harsha
AU - Pollen, Maressa
AU - Wieman, Lolis
AU - Craig, Tim J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a chronic, unpredictable disease. Long-term prophylactic treatments that offer durable efficacy, safety, and convenience are required to assist patients in achieving complete disease control, per international guidelines. We report an interim analysis of an ongoing phase 3 (VANGUARD) open-label extension (OLE) study evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of garadacimab for HAE prophylaxis. Methods: Adults and adolescents aged ≥12 years with HAE previously participating in phase 2 and pivotal phase 3 (VANGUARD) studies were rolled over to an OLE, alongside newly enrolled patients. Patients received garadacimab 200 mg subcutaneously, once monthly for ≥12 months. The primary endpoint was treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients with C1 inhibitor deficiency/dysfunction. Results: At data cut-off (February 13, 2023; N = 161), median (interquartile range) exposure was 13.8 months (11.9–16.3). For the primary endpoint, 133/159 patients experienced ≥1 TEAE (524 events), equivalent to 0.23 events/administration and 2.84 events/patient-year. Garadacimab-related TEAEs (13% of patients, 52 events) were most commonly injection-site reactions (ISRs). No deaths occurred. One patient discontinued treatment due to garadacimab-related moderate ISR. Most TEAEs were mild/moderate; three events were serious (COVID-19, two events; abdominal HAE attack, one event) and not garadacimab related. No abnormal bleeding, thromboembolic, severe hypersensitivity, or anaphylactic events were observed. Mean HAE attack rate decreased by 95% from the run-in period; 60% of patients were attack-free. Almost all patients (93%) rated their response to garadacimab as “good” or “excellent.”. Conclusion: Garadacimab has a favorable safety profile suitable for long-term use and provides durable protection against HAE attacks.
AB - Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a chronic, unpredictable disease. Long-term prophylactic treatments that offer durable efficacy, safety, and convenience are required to assist patients in achieving complete disease control, per international guidelines. We report an interim analysis of an ongoing phase 3 (VANGUARD) open-label extension (OLE) study evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of garadacimab for HAE prophylaxis. Methods: Adults and adolescents aged ≥12 years with HAE previously participating in phase 2 and pivotal phase 3 (VANGUARD) studies were rolled over to an OLE, alongside newly enrolled patients. Patients received garadacimab 200 mg subcutaneously, once monthly for ≥12 months. The primary endpoint was treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients with C1 inhibitor deficiency/dysfunction. Results: At data cut-off (February 13, 2023; N = 161), median (interquartile range) exposure was 13.8 months (11.9–16.3). For the primary endpoint, 133/159 patients experienced ≥1 TEAE (524 events), equivalent to 0.23 events/administration and 2.84 events/patient-year. Garadacimab-related TEAEs (13% of patients, 52 events) were most commonly injection-site reactions (ISRs). No deaths occurred. One patient discontinued treatment due to garadacimab-related moderate ISR. Most TEAEs were mild/moderate; three events were serious (COVID-19, two events; abdominal HAE attack, one event) and not garadacimab related. No abnormal bleeding, thromboembolic, severe hypersensitivity, or anaphylactic events were observed. Mean HAE attack rate decreased by 95% from the run-in period; 60% of patients were attack-free. Almost all patients (93%) rated their response to garadacimab as “good” or “excellent.”. Conclusion: Garadacimab has a favorable safety profile suitable for long-term use and provides durable protection against HAE attacks.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205911687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85205911687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/all.16351
DO - 10.1111/all.16351
M3 - Article
C2 - 39370961
AN - SCOPUS:85205911687
SN - 0105-4538
VL - 80
SP - 545
EP - 556
JO - Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
IS - 2
ER -