TY - JOUR
T1 - Low-value care and excess out-of-pocket expenditure among older adults with incident cancer – A machine learning approach
AU - Iloabuchi, Chibuzo
AU - Dwibedi, Nilanjana
AU - LeMasters, Traci
AU - Shen, Chan
AU - Ladani, Amit
AU - Sambamoorthi, Usha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the association of low-value care with excess out-of-pocket expenditure among older adults diagnosed with incident breast, prostate, colorectal cancers, and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Methods: We used a retrospective cohort study design with 12-month baseline and follow-up periods. We identified a cohort of older adults (age ≥ 66 years) diagnosed with breast, prostate, colorectal cancers, or Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma between January 2014 and December 2014. We assessed low-value care and patient out-of-pocket expenditure in the follow-up period. We identified relevant low-value services using ICD9/ICD10 and CPT/HCPCS codes from the linked health claims and patient out-of-pocket expenditure from Medicare claim files and expressed expenditure in 2016 USD. Results: About 29 % of older adults received at least one low-value care procedure during the follow-up period. Low-value care differed by gender, and rates were higher in women with colorectal cancer (32.7 %) vs. (28.8 %) and NHL (40 %) vs. (39 %) compared to men. Individuals who received one or more low-value care procedures had significantly higher mean out-of-pocket expenditure ($8,726 ± $7,214) vs. ($6,802 ± $6,102). XGBOOST, a machine learning algorithm revealed that low-value care was among the five leading predictors of OOP expenditure. Conclusion: One in four older adults with incident cancer received low-value care in 12-months after a cancer diagnosis. Across all cancer populations, individuals who received low-value care had significantly higher out-of-pocket expenditure. Excess out-of-pocket expenditure was driven by low-value care, fragmentation of care, and an increasing number of pre-existing chronic conditions. Policy Statement: This study focuses on health policy issues, specifically value-based care and its findings have important clinical and policy implications for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) which has issued a roadmap for states to accelerate the adoption of value-based care, with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) setting a goal of converting 50 % of traditional Medicare payment systems to alternative payment models tied to value-based care by 2022.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the association of low-value care with excess out-of-pocket expenditure among older adults diagnosed with incident breast, prostate, colorectal cancers, and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Methods: We used a retrospective cohort study design with 12-month baseline and follow-up periods. We identified a cohort of older adults (age ≥ 66 years) diagnosed with breast, prostate, colorectal cancers, or Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma between January 2014 and December 2014. We assessed low-value care and patient out-of-pocket expenditure in the follow-up period. We identified relevant low-value services using ICD9/ICD10 and CPT/HCPCS codes from the linked health claims and patient out-of-pocket expenditure from Medicare claim files and expressed expenditure in 2016 USD. Results: About 29 % of older adults received at least one low-value care procedure during the follow-up period. Low-value care differed by gender, and rates were higher in women with colorectal cancer (32.7 %) vs. (28.8 %) and NHL (40 %) vs. (39 %) compared to men. Individuals who received one or more low-value care procedures had significantly higher mean out-of-pocket expenditure ($8,726 ± $7,214) vs. ($6,802 ± $6,102). XGBOOST, a machine learning algorithm revealed that low-value care was among the five leading predictors of OOP expenditure. Conclusion: One in four older adults with incident cancer received low-value care in 12-months after a cancer diagnosis. Across all cancer populations, individuals who received low-value care had significantly higher out-of-pocket expenditure. Excess out-of-pocket expenditure was driven by low-value care, fragmentation of care, and an increasing number of pre-existing chronic conditions. Policy Statement: This study focuses on health policy issues, specifically value-based care and its findings have important clinical and policy implications for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) which has issued a roadmap for states to accelerate the adoption of value-based care, with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) setting a goal of converting 50 % of traditional Medicare payment systems to alternative payment models tied to value-based care by 2022.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118834003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118834003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100312
DO - 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100312
M3 - Article
C2 - 35281326
AN - SCOPUS:85118834003
SN - 2213-5383
VL - 30
JO - Journal of Cancer Policy
JF - Journal of Cancer Policy
M1 - 100312
ER -