Abstract
Background While effective treatments exist for binge-eating disorder (BED), prediction of treatment outcomes has proven difficult, and few reliable predictors have been identified. Machine learning is a promising method for improving the accuracy of difficult-to-predict outcomes. We compared the accuracy of traditional and machine-learning approaches for predicting BED treatment outcomes. Methods Participants were 191 adults with BED in a randomized controlled trial testing 6-month behavioral and stepped-care treatments.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2777-2788 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Psychological medicine |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 25 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Applied Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Machine learning v. traditional regression models predicting treatment outcomes for binge-eating disorder from a randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver