Mad cow coverage more positive in midwest papers

Michel M. Haigh; Michael Bruce; Elizabeth Craig

doi:10.1177/073953290802900105

Mad cow coverage more positive in midwest papers

Michel M. Haigh, Michael Bruce, Elizabeth Craig

Advertising and Public Relations

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

A content analysis comparing coverage of the first U.S. mad cow outbreak found that Midwest papers used more episodic frames and were more positive in tone than were coastal papers, which used more human health frames and were more negative overall.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	50-62
Number of pages	13
Journal	Newspaper Research Journal
Volume	29
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290802900105
State	Published - Jan 1 2008

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Communication

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1177/073953290802900105

Cite this

@article{585b0578a4414454952e8f9778522a71,

title = "Mad cow coverage more positive in midwest papers",

abstract = "A content analysis comparing coverage of the first U.S. mad cow outbreak found that Midwest papers used more episodic frames and were more positive in tone than were coastal papers, which used more human health frames and were more negative overall.",

author = "Haigh, {Michel M.} and Michael Bruce and Elizabeth Craig",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2008 Newspaper and Online News Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.",

year = "2008",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/073953290802900105",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "29",

pages = "50--62",

journal = "Newspaper Research Journal",

issn = "0739-5329",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mad cow coverage more positive in midwest papers

AU - Haigh, Michel M.

AU - Bruce, Michael

AU - Craig, Elizabeth

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - A content analysis comparing coverage of the first U.S. mad cow outbreak found that Midwest papers used more episodic frames and were more positive in tone than were coastal papers, which used more human health frames and were more negative overall.

AB - A content analysis comparing coverage of the first U.S. mad cow outbreak found that Midwest papers used more episodic frames and were more positive in tone than were coastal papers, which used more human health frames and were more negative overall.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862319518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862319518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/073953290802900105

DO - 10.1177/073953290802900105

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84862319518

SN - 0739-5329

VL - 29

SP - 50

EP - 62

JO - Newspaper Research Journal

JF - Newspaper Research Journal

IS - 1

ER -

Mad cow coverage more positive in midwest papers

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this