TY - JOUR
T1 - Making information matter
T2 - Symmetrically appealing layouts promote issue relevance, which facilitates action and attention to argument quality
AU - Middlewood, Brianna L.
AU - Gasper, Karen
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation ( 0952848 ). We would like to thank Keren Ben Zeev, Megan Nadzan, Collin Manning, Clarissa Masdar, Zane Patalive, Dian Zhuang, Jessica Sopp, and Ashley Przywitowski for their help with data collection.
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - What makes information relevant? We hypothesized that text displayed in a symmetrical, rather than asymmetrical, layout would be more appealing to people, and that appeal would then be used to infer that the topic is personally relevant. Relevance, in turn, should increase the degree to which people engage with the information presented in the message. In three experiments, respondents read text arranged symmetrically or asymmetrically. As predicted, symmetry influences relevance indirectly through appeal, such that symmetrical articles were more appealing than asymmetrical articles, and appeal predicted relevance. Relevance, then, predicted the desire to acquire and act on the information in the article (Experiment 2) and increased attention to argument quality, for participants were more influenced by strong, rather than weak, arguments (Experiment 3). Perceptions of reading difficulty and trustworthiness did not account for the findings, indicating that it is the appeal of symmetry which promoted issue relevance.
AB - What makes information relevant? We hypothesized that text displayed in a symmetrical, rather than asymmetrical, layout would be more appealing to people, and that appeal would then be used to infer that the topic is personally relevant. Relevance, in turn, should increase the degree to which people engage with the information presented in the message. In three experiments, respondents read text arranged symmetrically or asymmetrically. As predicted, symmetry influences relevance indirectly through appeal, such that symmetrical articles were more appealing than asymmetrical articles, and appeal predicted relevance. Relevance, then, predicted the desire to acquire and act on the information in the article (Experiment 2) and increased attention to argument quality, for participants were more influenced by strong, rather than weak, arguments (Experiment 3). Perceptions of reading difficulty and trustworthiness did not account for the findings, indicating that it is the appeal of symmetry which promoted issue relevance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897402095&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897402095&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84897402095
SN - 0022-1031
VL - 53
SP - 100
EP - 106
JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
ER -