Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Management of blunt splenic trauma: Computed tomographic contrast blush predicts failure of nonoperative management

  • M. J. Schurr
  • , T. C. Fabian
  • , M. Gavant
  • , M. A. Croce
  • , K. A. Kudsk
  • , G. Minard
  • , G. Woodman
  • , F. E. Pritchard
  • , L. D. Britt
  • , M. G. Ochsner
  • , M. B. Hawkins
  • , J. S. Smith
  • , G. S. Rozycki
  • , M. Sugrue
  • , D. Kissinger
  • , F. R. Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma is widely accepted; however, reported failure rates have ranged as high as 40%. There are few factors available to identify failures reliably. To characterize failures of nonoperative management better, we retrospectively reviewed 309 blunt splenic injuries treated at our level I trauma center over a 5-year period. Eighty- nine patients were initially managed nonoperatively (29%), and 12 patients failed this approach (13%). Upon review of the initial computed tomography scans, a hyperdense collection of contrast media in the splenic parenchyma, or 'contrast blush' was noted in 8 of 12 (67%) patients who failed and in 5 of 77 (6%) of those who were successfully managed nonoperatively (p < 0.0001). These data suggest that the presence of a contrast blush is an important consideration when deciding the method for management of the splenic injury. If these results are confirmed in a prospective fashion, the failure rate of nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma could be reduced by identification of the contrast blush.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)507-513
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Trauma
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management of blunt splenic trauma: Computed tomographic contrast blush predicts failure of nonoperative management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this