TY - JOUR
T1 - Management of left ventricular assist device infection with heart transplantation
AU - Prendergast, Thomas W.
AU - Todd, Barbara A.
AU - Beyer, A. James
AU - Furukawa, Satoshi
AU - Eisen, Howard J.
AU - Addonizio, V. Paul
AU - Browne, Barry J.
AU - Jeevanandam, Valluvan
PY - 1997/7
Y1 - 1997/7
N2 - Background. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are being used as bridges to heart transplantation (HT). Infection of the LVAD in this patient population represents a serious complication, as simple LVAD removal or delaying HT may result in death. To improve outcomes in this group of patients, we performed HT in the presence of LVAD infection. Methods. Eighteen patients underwent LVAD implantation followed by HT. Ten underwent HT in the absence of LVAD infection (group 1); and 8, in the presence of LVAD infection (group 2). All patients were treated similarly except for modification of immunosuppression in group 2 patients. Results. Infectious and noninfectious complications were equivalent between the two groups. There was no difference between groups in regard to intraoperative deaths (one versus none), long-term survival (8/10 versus 7/8), wound complications (three versus none), and mean length of hospital stay after HT (21 versus 26 days). Conclusions. Patients with LVAD infection are too seriously ill to allow LVAD removal or delay of HT. Transplantation in the face of infection is an effective treatment option.
AB - Background. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are being used as bridges to heart transplantation (HT). Infection of the LVAD in this patient population represents a serious complication, as simple LVAD removal or delaying HT may result in death. To improve outcomes in this group of patients, we performed HT in the presence of LVAD infection. Methods. Eighteen patients underwent LVAD implantation followed by HT. Ten underwent HT in the absence of LVAD infection (group 1); and 8, in the presence of LVAD infection (group 2). All patients were treated similarly except for modification of immunosuppression in group 2 patients. Results. Infectious and noninfectious complications were equivalent between the two groups. There was no difference between groups in regard to intraoperative deaths (one versus none), long-term survival (8/10 versus 7/8), wound complications (three versus none), and mean length of hospital stay after HT (21 versus 26 days). Conclusions. Patients with LVAD infection are too seriously ill to allow LVAD removal or delay of HT. Transplantation in the face of infection is an effective treatment option.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030844539&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030844539&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00286-5
DO - 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00286-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 9236350
AN - SCOPUS:0030844539
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 64
SP - 142
EP - 147
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 1
ER -