Managing difficult conversations

John B. Bartholomew, Sherri L. Sanders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The academic ideal of shared governance requires significant participation of faculty in the decision-making and service aspects of a university. This is especially true at the department level, where a relatively small number of faculty must work together and contribute to the mission. As a result, one of the more challenging roles for department chairs is dealing with disruptive faculty. This article is designed to provide some insight on this challenge within the frame of managing difficult conversations. The authors begin with a presentation of motives and biases from the perspective of both the chair and the faculty. Efforts to build diversity and inclusion are then used to illustrate the process of managing faculty and building consensus. Finally, aspects of negotiation that might be applied to these relationships are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)358-362
Number of pages5
JournalKinesiology Review
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Managing difficult conversations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this