TY - JOUR
T1 - Markov Bayes simulation for structural uncertainty estimation
AU - Sil, Samik
AU - Srinivasan, Sanjay
AU - Sen, Mrinal
AU - Ríos López, Jaime J.
AU - Vidal, Madain Moreno
AU - Rusic, Alberto
AU - González, Manuel
PY - 2008/1/1
Y1 - 2008/1/1
N2 - Reservoir models are built using disparate datasets each of which may be prone to experimental and interpretational errors and therefore a resulting reservoir model is generally associated with uncertainties. One of the primary sources of uncertainties lies in the structure (or reservoir architecture) estimation from seismic data. Geostatistics can be used to integrate seismic data with well data for the purpose of structural uncertainty estimation. In this paper we present a case study from the Gulf of Mexico, where structural uncertainty associated with a seismic horizon is modeled using Markov-Bayes stochastic simulation. For this simulation, seismic data is used as "soft" or secondary data while well log derived marker depths are used as hard data. Simulation results show uncertainty distributions with smaller variance in the vicinity of the wells. However, in regions away from the wells, the interpreter-picked horizon appears to fall outside the error bounds predicted by our stochastic algorithm. Lack of well control, existence of faults, improper choice of seismic processing parameters (error in time migrated images) and interpreters' bias are some of the plausible causes of this disparity.
AB - Reservoir models are built using disparate datasets each of which may be prone to experimental and interpretational errors and therefore a resulting reservoir model is generally associated with uncertainties. One of the primary sources of uncertainties lies in the structure (or reservoir architecture) estimation from seismic data. Geostatistics can be used to integrate seismic data with well data for the purpose of structural uncertainty estimation. In this paper we present a case study from the Gulf of Mexico, where structural uncertainty associated with a seismic horizon is modeled using Markov-Bayes stochastic simulation. For this simulation, seismic data is used as "soft" or secondary data while well log derived marker depths are used as hard data. Simulation results show uncertainty distributions with smaller variance in the vicinity of the wells. However, in regions away from the wells, the interpreter-picked horizon appears to fall outside the error bounds predicted by our stochastic algorithm. Lack of well control, existence of faults, improper choice of seismic processing parameters (error in time migrated images) and interpreters' bias are some of the plausible causes of this disparity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58049184924&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58049184924&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1190/1.3059198
DO - 10.1190/1.3059198
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:58049184924
SN - 1052-3812
VL - 27
SP - 1491
EP - 1495
JO - SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts
JF - SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts
IS - 1
ER -