Abstract
Bulow and Levin's (2006) "Matching and Price Competition" studies a matching model in which hospitals compete for interns by offering wages. We relax the assumption of symmetric linear costs and compare the pricing equilibrium that results to the firm-optimal competitive equilibrium. With linear and asymmetric costs, competition in the pricing equilibrium may not be localized, but all other qualitative comparisons of Bulow and Levin (2006) hold. With non-linear and symmetric costs workers' average utility in the pricing equilibrium may be higher than in the firm- optimal competitive equilibrium. With asymmetric and non-linear costs, firms need not choose scores from an interval in a pricing equilibrium, which may make competition even less localized.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 835-844 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | International Journal of Game Theory |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 1 2013 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Statistics and Probability
- Mathematics (miscellaneous)
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty