TY - GEN
T1 - Measuring and optimizing design variety using herfindahl index
AU - Ahmed, Faez
AU - Ramachandran, Sharath Kumar
AU - Fuge, Mark
AU - Hunter, Sam
AU - Miller, Scarlett
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 ASME.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - In this paper, we propose a new design variety metric based on the Herfindahl index. We also propose a practical procedure for comparing variety metrics via the construction of ground truth datasets from pairwise comparisons by experts. Using two new datasets, we show that this new variety measure aligns with human ratings more than some existing and commonly used tree-based metrics. This metric also has three main advantages over existing metrics: a) It is a super-modular function, which enables us to optimize design variety using a polynomial time greedy algorithm. b) The parametric nature of this metric allows us to fit the metric to better represent variety for new domains. c) It has higher sensitivity in distinguishing between variety of sets of randomly selected designs than existing methods. Overall, our results shed light on some qualities that good design variety metrics should possess and the non-trivial challenges associated with collecting the data needed to measure those qualities.
AB - In this paper, we propose a new design variety metric based on the Herfindahl index. We also propose a practical procedure for comparing variety metrics via the construction of ground truth datasets from pairwise comparisons by experts. Using two new datasets, we show that this new variety measure aligns with human ratings more than some existing and commonly used tree-based metrics. This metric also has three main advantages over existing metrics: a) It is a super-modular function, which enables us to optimize design variety using a polynomial time greedy algorithm. b) The parametric nature of this metric allows us to fit the metric to better represent variety for new domains. c) It has higher sensitivity in distinguishing between variety of sets of randomly selected designs than existing methods. Overall, our results shed light on some qualities that good design variety metrics should possess and the non-trivial challenges associated with collecting the data needed to measure those qualities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076428317&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076428317&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/DETC2019-97778
DO - 10.1115/DETC2019-97778
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85076428317
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
BT - 31st International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME 2019 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC-CIE 2019
Y2 - 18 August 2019 through 21 August 2019
ER -