TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring Compositions in Organic Depth Profiling
T2 - Results from a VAMAS Interlaboratory Study
AU - Shard, Alexander G.
AU - Havelund, Rasmus
AU - Spencer, Steve J.
AU - Gilmore, Ian S.
AU - Alexander, Morgan R.
AU - Angerer, Tina B.
AU - Aoyagi, Satoka
AU - Barnes, Jean Paul
AU - Benayad, Anass
AU - Bernasik, Andrzej
AU - Ceccone, Giacomo
AU - Counsell, Jonathan D.P.
AU - Deeks, Christopher
AU - Fletcher, John S.
AU - Graham, Daniel J.
AU - Heuser, Christian
AU - Lee, Tae Geol
AU - Marie, Camille
AU - Marzec, Mateusz M.
AU - Mishra, Gautam
AU - Rading, Derk
AU - Renault, Olivier
AU - Scurr, David J.
AU - Shon, Hyun Kyong
AU - Spampinato, Valentina
AU - Tian, Hua
AU - Wang, Fuyi
AU - Winograd, Nicholas
AU - Wu, Kui
AU - Wucher, Andreas
AU - Zhou, Yufan
AU - Zhu, Zihua
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2015/8/20
Y1 - 2015/8/20
N2 - We report the results of a VAMAS (Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards) interlaboratory study on the measurement of composition in organic depth profiling. Layered samples with known binary compositions of Irganox 1010 and either Irganox 1098 or Fmoc-pentafluoro-l-phenylalanine in each layer were manufactured in a single batch and distributed to more than 20 participating laboratories. The samples were analyzed using argon cluster ion sputtering and either X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) or time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) to generate depth profiles. Participants were asked to estimate the volume fractions in two of the layers and were provided with the compositions of all other layers. Participants using XPS provided volume fractions within 0.03 of the nominal values. Participants using ToF-SIMS either made no attempt, or used various methods that gave results ranging in error from 0.02 to over 0.10 in volume fraction, the latter representing a 50% relative error for a nominal volume fraction of 0.2. Error was predominantly caused by inadequacy in the ability to compensate for primary ion intensity variations and the matrix effect in SIMS. Matrix effects in these materials appear to be more pronounced as the number of atoms in both the primary analytical ion and the secondary ion increase. Using the participants' data we show that organic SIMS matrix effects can be measured and are remarkably consistent between instruments. We provide recommendations for identifying and compensating for matrix effects. Finally, we demonstrate, using a simple normalization method, that virtually all ToF-SIMS participants could have obtained estimates of volume fraction that were at least as accurate and consistent as XPS.
AB - We report the results of a VAMAS (Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards) interlaboratory study on the measurement of composition in organic depth profiling. Layered samples with known binary compositions of Irganox 1010 and either Irganox 1098 or Fmoc-pentafluoro-l-phenylalanine in each layer were manufactured in a single batch and distributed to more than 20 participating laboratories. The samples were analyzed using argon cluster ion sputtering and either X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) or time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) to generate depth profiles. Participants were asked to estimate the volume fractions in two of the layers and were provided with the compositions of all other layers. Participants using XPS provided volume fractions within 0.03 of the nominal values. Participants using ToF-SIMS either made no attempt, or used various methods that gave results ranging in error from 0.02 to over 0.10 in volume fraction, the latter representing a 50% relative error for a nominal volume fraction of 0.2. Error was predominantly caused by inadequacy in the ability to compensate for primary ion intensity variations and the matrix effect in SIMS. Matrix effects in these materials appear to be more pronounced as the number of atoms in both the primary analytical ion and the secondary ion increase. Using the participants' data we show that organic SIMS matrix effects can be measured and are remarkably consistent between instruments. We provide recommendations for identifying and compensating for matrix effects. Finally, we demonstrate, using a simple normalization method, that virtually all ToF-SIMS participants could have obtained estimates of volume fraction that were at least as accurate and consistent as XPS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939817976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939817976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05625
DO - 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05625
M3 - Article
C2 - 26204428
AN - SCOPUS:84939817976
SN - 1520-6106
VL - 119
SP - 10784
EP - 10797
JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry B
JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry B
IS - 33
ER -