TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring How Systems-Centered® Members Connect with Group Dynamics
T2 - FSQ-2 Construct Validity
AU - Whitcomb, Kaitlyn E.
AU - O’Neill, Richard M.
AU - Burlingame, Gary M.
AU - Mogle, Jacqueline
AU - Gantt, Susan P.
AU - Cannon, Jennifer A.N.
AU - Roney, Tristin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The American Group Psychotherapy Association, Inc.
PY - 2018/4/3
Y1 - 2018/4/3
N2 - Understanding and intervening at the connection between group dynamics and member behavior has been a long-standing challenge. Functional subgrouping (FS) is the core Systems-centered training and therapy (SCT) method and is hypothesized to solve vexing member/group dynamic problems such as scapegoating. The self-report Functional Subgrouping Questionnaire-2 (FSQ-2) was developed to measure the amount of functional subgrouping in a group. The current FSQ-2 construct validity study aims to determine whether: 1) FSQ-2 scores change across sessions; 2) level of SCT experience is related to scores; and 3) SCT experience moderates change in FSQ-2 scores over SCT training. Results from groups at various SCT training events showed higher FSQ-2 responses for those with greater SCT experience, and increased scores over time. However, change over time on most FSQ-2 items did not depend on SCT experience level. Findings provide further support for the construct validity of the FSQ-2, and thus also for the SCT model. Suggestions for future SCT/FSQ-2 research are made.
AB - Understanding and intervening at the connection between group dynamics and member behavior has been a long-standing challenge. Functional subgrouping (FS) is the core Systems-centered training and therapy (SCT) method and is hypothesized to solve vexing member/group dynamic problems such as scapegoating. The self-report Functional Subgrouping Questionnaire-2 (FSQ-2) was developed to measure the amount of functional subgrouping in a group. The current FSQ-2 construct validity study aims to determine whether: 1) FSQ-2 scores change across sessions; 2) level of SCT experience is related to scores; and 3) SCT experience moderates change in FSQ-2 scores over SCT training. Results from groups at various SCT training events showed higher FSQ-2 responses for those with greater SCT experience, and increased scores over time. However, change over time on most FSQ-2 items did not depend on SCT experience level. Findings provide further support for the construct validity of the FSQ-2, and thus also for the SCT model. Suggestions for future SCT/FSQ-2 research are made.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041591797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041591797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00207284.2017.1381024
DO - 10.1080/00207284.2017.1381024
M3 - Article
C2 - 38475649
AN - SCOPUS:85041591797
SN - 0020-7284
VL - 68
SP - 163
EP - 183
JO - International Journal of Group Psychotherapy
JF - International Journal of Group Psychotherapy
IS - 2
ER -