TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring Perceptions of Diabetes-Related Concepts
T2 - A Preliminary Study
AU - Fitzgerald, James T.
AU - Gruppen, Larry D.
AU - Wray, Linda A.
AU - Shay, Barbara R.
AU - Anderson, Robert M.
PY - 2003/5
Y1 - 2003/5
N2 - PURPOSE this pilot study explored health professionals' and patients' perceptions of diabetes through the development of the Diabetes Semantic Differential Scales (DSDS). These scales evaluate the meaning of diabetes-related concepts. METHODS Health professionals (n=39) attending a CME course completed the health professional version of the DSDS. Patients (n=70) completed the patient version of the DSDS. RESULTS The reliability of the DSDS was supported. The scale scores of health professionals, African American patients, and Caucasian patients, examined initially by one-way analyses of variance, showed significant differences among the groups for 4 of the 18 diabetes concepts. Effect sizes were also examined among these groups. For 7 concepts, there was a significant practical difference between the perceptions of the health professionals and the African American patients. For the Caucasian patients, differences were noted for 6 concepts. CONCLUSIONS There are 3 primary inferences from this pilot study. First, health professionals and patients are likely to hold different perceptions of key diabetes concepts. Second, the concepts on which professionals and patients differ are not always what one would expect. Third, health professionals should clarify patients' understanding of diabetes to minimize the potential for miscommunication.
AB - PURPOSE this pilot study explored health professionals' and patients' perceptions of diabetes through the development of the Diabetes Semantic Differential Scales (DSDS). These scales evaluate the meaning of diabetes-related concepts. METHODS Health professionals (n=39) attending a CME course completed the health professional version of the DSDS. Patients (n=70) completed the patient version of the DSDS. RESULTS The reliability of the DSDS was supported. The scale scores of health professionals, African American patients, and Caucasian patients, examined initially by one-way analyses of variance, showed significant differences among the groups for 4 of the 18 diabetes concepts. Effect sizes were also examined among these groups. For 7 concepts, there was a significant practical difference between the perceptions of the health professionals and the African American patients. For the Caucasian patients, differences were noted for 6 concepts. CONCLUSIONS There are 3 primary inferences from this pilot study. First, health professionals and patients are likely to hold different perceptions of key diabetes concepts. Second, the concepts on which professionals and patients differ are not always what one would expect. Third, health professionals should clarify patients' understanding of diabetes to minimize the potential for miscommunication.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037812038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037812038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/014572170302900312
DO - 10.1177/014572170302900312
M3 - Article
C2 - 12854338
AN - SCOPUS:0037812038
SN - 0145-7217
VL - 29
SP - 480
EP - 487
JO - The Diabetes Educator
JF - The Diabetes Educator
IS - 3
ER -