TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring religious identities in surveys
AU - Alwin, Duane F.
AU - Felson, Jacob L.
AU - Walker, Edward T.
AU - Tufiş, Paula A.
N1 - Funding Information:
DUANE F. ALWIN is the McCourtney Professor of Sociology and Demography at Pennsylvania State University. JACOB L. FELSON, EDWARD T. WALKER, and PAULA A. TUFIS are graduate students in the Department of Sociology, Pennsylvania State University. The authors acknowledge research support from the Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, and the McCourtney endowment. We thank Roger Finke, Peter Miller, and anonymous reviewers for providing helpful comments on an earlier version of the article. Address correspondence to Duane F. Alwin; e-mail: dfa2@psu.edu.
PY - 2006/12
Y1 - 2006/12
N2 - The purpose of this article is to acquaint the broader public opinion research audience with what has been a salient issue within the community of scholars of religion. We address the question of how best to conceptualize and measure religious identities in research on contemporary American society. We consider the main approaches to the measurement of religious identification with regard to their backgrounds, their assumptions about the importance of understanding religious identities in historically relevant terms, and the practical considerations of survey measurement. Using data from the General Social Survey, particularly recent innovative efforts to obtain information on subjective association with particular religious traditions and/or movements (e.g., Pentecostal, fundamentalist, evangelical, mainline, or liberal Protestant), we compare the two main approaches: the traditional "denominational" approach, where religious identities are assumed to be associated with religious denominations, and the subjective approach, where religious identities are assumed to be captured by a set of " nondenominational" reference categories linked to particular historical religious traditions or social movements. We conclude that both approaches have substantial predictive validity, and the most effective strategy for future research may be one that uses a combination of approaches, rather than one that relies entirely on a single method of measurement.
AB - The purpose of this article is to acquaint the broader public opinion research audience with what has been a salient issue within the community of scholars of religion. We address the question of how best to conceptualize and measure religious identities in research on contemporary American society. We consider the main approaches to the measurement of religious identification with regard to their backgrounds, their assumptions about the importance of understanding religious identities in historically relevant terms, and the practical considerations of survey measurement. Using data from the General Social Survey, particularly recent innovative efforts to obtain information on subjective association with particular religious traditions and/or movements (e.g., Pentecostal, fundamentalist, evangelical, mainline, or liberal Protestant), we compare the two main approaches: the traditional "denominational" approach, where religious identities are assumed to be associated with religious denominations, and the subjective approach, where religious identities are assumed to be captured by a set of " nondenominational" reference categories linked to particular historical religious traditions or social movements. We conclude that both approaches have substantial predictive validity, and the most effective strategy for future research may be one that uses a combination of approaches, rather than one that relies entirely on a single method of measurement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845305444&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845305444&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/poq/nfl024
DO - 10.1093/poq/nfl024
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33845305444
SN - 0033-362X
VL - 70
SP - 530
EP - 564
JO - Public Opinion Quarterly
JF - Public Opinion Quarterly
IS - 4
ER -