TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanics of Fold-and-Thrust Belts Based on Geomechanical Modeling
AU - Gao, B.
AU - Flemings, P. B.
AU - Nikolinakou, M. A.
AU - Saffer, D. M.
AU - Heidari, M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by Statoil Fellowship and the University of Texas at Austin GeoFluids Consortium, which is supported by the following compa nies: Anadarko, BHP Billiton, BP, Chevron, Conoco-Phillips, ExxonMobil, Hess, PEMEX, Repsol, Shell, and Statoil. Publication authorized by the director of the Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, the University of Texas at Austin. No new data were used in producing this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
©2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - We use a large strain geomechanical model and critical state soil mechanics to study the evolution of stress and deformation in an evolving fold-and-thrust belt and its underlying footwall sediments. Both mean effective stress and deviatoric stress contribute to porosity loss within the wedge with 35% of the porosity loss resulting from increased shear. As a result, porosity increases abruptly across the décollement because both mean-effective and shear stresses are much higher inside the wedge than in the footwall. As the basal friction coefficient (μb) increases, more shear stress is transmitted across the décollement, resulting in additional compaction of the footwall sediment and decrease in the porosity contrast across the décollement. As the internal friction coefficient (μs) increases, the wedge sediment is more compacted because it can withstand higher mean-effective and deviatoric stresses. Inside the wedge, the sediment experiences subhorizontal shortening strain and subvertical elongation strain. We predict a 10–30 km wide “transition zone” in which the shear-stress ratios and compaction curves change rapidly between compressional critical state failure and uniaxial strain (K0) state. Our model results agree with the taper angles and the stress orientations predicted by critical taper theory. This large-strain drained modeling approach provides first-order insights into the mechanical processes of loading and compaction in fold-and-thrust belts and a foundation for understanding field observations of pressure, stress, and deformation in thrust belt systems.
AB - We use a large strain geomechanical model and critical state soil mechanics to study the evolution of stress and deformation in an evolving fold-and-thrust belt and its underlying footwall sediments. Both mean effective stress and deviatoric stress contribute to porosity loss within the wedge with 35% of the porosity loss resulting from increased shear. As a result, porosity increases abruptly across the décollement because both mean-effective and shear stresses are much higher inside the wedge than in the footwall. As the basal friction coefficient (μb) increases, more shear stress is transmitted across the décollement, resulting in additional compaction of the footwall sediment and decrease in the porosity contrast across the décollement. As the internal friction coefficient (μs) increases, the wedge sediment is more compacted because it can withstand higher mean-effective and deviatoric stresses. Inside the wedge, the sediment experiences subhorizontal shortening strain and subvertical elongation strain. We predict a 10–30 km wide “transition zone” in which the shear-stress ratios and compaction curves change rapidly between compressional critical state failure and uniaxial strain (K0) state. Our model results agree with the taper angles and the stress orientations predicted by critical taper theory. This large-strain drained modeling approach provides first-order insights into the mechanical processes of loading and compaction in fold-and-thrust belts and a foundation for understanding field observations of pressure, stress, and deformation in thrust belt systems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048827982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048827982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2018JB015434
DO - 10.1029/2018JB015434
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85048827982
SN - 2169-9313
VL - 123
SP - 4454
EP - 4474
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
IS - 5
ER -