TY - JOUR
T1 - Memory Interventions in the Criminal Justice System
T2 - Some Practical Ethical Considerations
AU - Cabrera, Laura Y.
AU - Elger, Bernice S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - In recent years, discussion around memory modification interventions has gained attention. However, discussion around the use of memory interventions in the criminal justice system has been mostly absent. In this paper we start by highlighting the importance memory has for human well-being and personal identity, as well as its role within the criminal forensic setting; in particular, for claiming and accepting legal responsibility, for moral learning, and for retribution. We provide examples of memory interventions that are currently available for medical purposes, but that in the future could be used in the forensic setting to modify criminal offenders’ memories. In this section we contrast the cases of (1) dampening and (2) enhancing memories of criminal offenders. We then present from a pragmatic approach some pressing ethical issues associated with these types of memory interventions. The paper ends up highlighting how these pragmatic considerations can help establish ethically justified criteria regarding the possibility of interventions aimed at modifying criminal offenders’ memories.
AB - In recent years, discussion around memory modification interventions has gained attention. However, discussion around the use of memory interventions in the criminal justice system has been mostly absent. In this paper we start by highlighting the importance memory has for human well-being and personal identity, as well as its role within the criminal forensic setting; in particular, for claiming and accepting legal responsibility, for moral learning, and for retribution. We provide examples of memory interventions that are currently available for medical purposes, but that in the future could be used in the forensic setting to modify criminal offenders’ memories. In this section we contrast the cases of (1) dampening and (2) enhancing memories of criminal offenders. We then present from a pragmatic approach some pressing ethical issues associated with these types of memory interventions. The paper ends up highlighting how these pragmatic considerations can help establish ethically justified criteria regarding the possibility of interventions aimed at modifying criminal offenders’ memories.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952059197&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952059197&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11673-015-9680-2
DO - 10.1007/s11673-015-9680-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 26715046
AN - SCOPUS:84952059197
SN - 1176-7529
VL - 13
SP - 95
EP - 103
JO - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
JF - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
IS - 1
ER -