TY - JOUR
T1 - Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory
T2 - Evidence from interference effects
AU - Lacey, Simon
AU - Campbell, Christine
N1 - Funding Information:
Correspondence should be addressed to Simon Lacey, School of Human Sciences, Southampton Solent University, East Park Terrace, Southampton SO4 0YN, UK. Email: [email protected] This research forms part of the first author’s doctoral thesis under the supervision of the second author and is supported by a bursary from Southampton Solent University.
PY - 2006/2
Y1 - 2006/2
N2 - Two experiments used visual-, verbal-, and haptic-interference tasks during encoding (Experiment 1) and retrieval (Experiment 2) to examine mental representation of familiar and unfamiliar objects in visual/haptic crossmodal memory. Three competing theories are discussed, which variously suggest that these representations are: (a) visual; (b) dual-code - visual for unfamiliar objects but visual and verbal for familiar objects; or (c) amodal. The results suggest that representations of unfamiliar objects are primarily visual but that crossmodal memory for familiar objects may rely on a network of different representations. The pattern of verbal-interference effects suggests that verbal strategies facilitate encoding of unfamiliar objects regardless of modality, but only haptic recognition regardless of familiarity. The results raise further research questions about all three theoretical approaches.
AB - Two experiments used visual-, verbal-, and haptic-interference tasks during encoding (Experiment 1) and retrieval (Experiment 2) to examine mental representation of familiar and unfamiliar objects in visual/haptic crossmodal memory. Three competing theories are discussed, which variously suggest that these representations are: (a) visual; (b) dual-code - visual for unfamiliar objects but visual and verbal for familiar objects; or (c) amodal. The results suggest that representations of unfamiliar objects are primarily visual but that crossmodal memory for familiar objects may rely on a network of different representations. The pattern of verbal-interference effects suggests that verbal strategies facilitate encoding of unfamiliar objects regardless of modality, but only haptic recognition regardless of familiarity. The results raise further research questions about all three theoretical approaches.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645055119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645055119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17470210500173232
DO - 10.1080/17470210500173232
M3 - Article
C2 - 16618639
AN - SCOPUS:33645055119
SN - 1747-0218
VL - 59
SP - 361
EP - 376
JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
IS - 2
ER -