Abstract
Based on theoretical and methodological similarities between research on recreation-related norms and contingent valuation, three methodological issues-question format, starting point bias, and information bias-are explored as they apply to measuring crowding-related norms of visitors to two national parks. Few statistically or substantively significant differences in crowding-related norms were found to be associated with these methodological issues. Study findings suggest that measures of crowding-related norms may be relatively "robust," and this may add weight to the "validity" of the theory and methods associated with crowding-related norms in outdoor recreation.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 339-348 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Leisure Sciences |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 3-4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2002 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
- Sociology and Political Science
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management