Abstract
ABSTRACT: Are citizens in predominantly black neighborhoods or communities better off with public services provided by a consolidated government where blacks are in the minority than when they control municipal government in an autonomous suburban setting? This paper reports using a comparison group design to investigate four hypotheses: that blacks in predominantly black suburbs in a fragmented environment (1) enjoy more services, (2) evidence lower dissatisfaction with services, (3) are less disaffected, and (4) participate more than minorities in a consolidated government. Contrary to public choice expectations, the findings indicate substantial evidence for traditional reformers' beliefs in the advantages of consolidated government.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 479-493 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Urban Affairs |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1991 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
- Urban Studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'METROPOLITAN FRAGMENTATION AND SUBURBAN GHETTOS: Some Empirical Observations on Institutional Racism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver