Missing data: our view of the state of the art.

Joseph L. Schafer, John W. Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9118 Scopus citations

Abstract

Statistical procedures for missing data have vastly improved, yet misconception and unsound practice still abound. The authors frame the missing-data problem, review methods, offer advice, and raise issues that remain unresolved. They clear up common misunderstandings regarding the missing at random (MAR) concept. They summarize the evidence against older procedures and, with few exceptions, discourage their use. They present, in both technical and practical language, 2 general approaches that come highly recommended: maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian multiple imputation (MI). Newer developments are discussed, including some for dealing with missing data that are not MAR. Although not yet in the mainstream, these procedures may eventually extend the ML and MI methods that currently represent the state of the art.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-177
Number of pages31
JournalPsychological Methods
Volume7
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1 2002

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Missing data: our view of the state of the art.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this