TY - JOUR
T1 - Mode of Delivery Preference among Pregnant Nulliparous Women
AU - Kjerulff, Kristen H.
AU - Attanasio, Laura B.
AU - Edmonds, Joyce K.
AU - Repke, John T.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, grant No. R01-HD052990.
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019.
PY - 2019/6/1
Y1 - 2019/6/1
N2 - Background: Nearly a third of women in the United States deliver by cesarean at first childbirth. The extent to which women's prenatal mode of delivery preference contributes to the cesarean decision is not clear. Little research has measured pregnant nulliparous women's prelabor mode of delivery preference in relation to actual mode of delivery in the United States. Materials and Methods: A total of 3006 pregnant nulliparous women were asked about mode of delivery preference during pregnancy as part of the First Baby Study, a prospective study of women delivering in Pennsylvania hospitals, 2009-2011. Multivariable regression models were used to assess the association between women's preference for cesarean delivery and two decision stages: (1) the decision to have planned prelabor cesarean and (2) the intrapartum decision to have unplanned cesarean among those attempting vaginal delivery, adjusting for confounders. Results: Overall, 3.1% preferred cesarean delivery, 3.0% had no preference, and 93.9% preferred vaginal. Among those who preferred vaginal delivery, 4% had a planned cesarean; among those with no preference, 13.3% did; and among those who preferred cesarean, 33.7% did. In adjusted models, preference for cesarean was strongly associated with having planned prelabor cesarean (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.26-11.12), but was not significantly associated with unplanned cesarean among those who attempted vaginal delivery (aOR = 1.35; 95% CI = 0.77-2.38). Conclusions: Although preference for cesarean delivery among nulliparous women was uncommon, women who preferred cesarean were more likely to have planned prelabor cesarean delivery than those who preferred vaginal delivery.
AB - Background: Nearly a third of women in the United States deliver by cesarean at first childbirth. The extent to which women's prenatal mode of delivery preference contributes to the cesarean decision is not clear. Little research has measured pregnant nulliparous women's prelabor mode of delivery preference in relation to actual mode of delivery in the United States. Materials and Methods: A total of 3006 pregnant nulliparous women were asked about mode of delivery preference during pregnancy as part of the First Baby Study, a prospective study of women delivering in Pennsylvania hospitals, 2009-2011. Multivariable regression models were used to assess the association between women's preference for cesarean delivery and two decision stages: (1) the decision to have planned prelabor cesarean and (2) the intrapartum decision to have unplanned cesarean among those attempting vaginal delivery, adjusting for confounders. Results: Overall, 3.1% preferred cesarean delivery, 3.0% had no preference, and 93.9% preferred vaginal. Among those who preferred vaginal delivery, 4% had a planned cesarean; among those with no preference, 13.3% did; and among those who preferred cesarean, 33.7% did. In adjusted models, preference for cesarean was strongly associated with having planned prelabor cesarean (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.26-11.12), but was not significantly associated with unplanned cesarean among those who attempted vaginal delivery (aOR = 1.35; 95% CI = 0.77-2.38). Conclusions: Although preference for cesarean delivery among nulliparous women was uncommon, women who preferred cesarean were more likely to have planned prelabor cesarean delivery than those who preferred vaginal delivery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067632865&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067632865&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/jwh.2018.6989
DO - 10.1089/jwh.2018.6989
M3 - Article
C2 - 30412449
AN - SCOPUS:85067632865
SN - 1540-9996
VL - 28
SP - 874
EP - 884
JO - Journal of Women's Health
JF - Journal of Women's Health
IS - 6
ER -