TY - GEN
T1 - Modeling of cube array roughness
T2 - ASME 2021 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2021
AU - Altland, Samuel
AU - Xu, Haosen H.A.
AU - Yang, Xiang I.A.
AU - Kunz, Robert
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-FE0001730. Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Flow over arrays of cubes is an extensively studied model problem for rough wall turbulent boundary layers. While considerable research has been performed in computationally investigating these topologies using DNS and LES, the ability of sublayer-resolved RANS to predict the bulk flow phenomena of these systems is relatively unexplored, especially at low and high packing densities. Here, RANS simulations are conducted on six different packing densities of cubes in aligned and staggered configurations. The packing densities investigated span from what would classically be defined as isolated, up to those in the dtype roughness regime, filling in the gap in the present literature. Three different sublayer-resolved turbulence closure models were tested for each case; a low Reynolds number k-e model, the Menter k-w SST model, and a full Reynolds stress model. Comparisons of the velocity fields, secondary flow features, and drag coefficients are made between the RANS results and existing LES and DNS results. There is a significant degree of variability in the performance of the various RANS models across all comparison metrics. However, the Reynolds stress model demonstrated the best accuracy in terms of the mean velocity profile as well as drag partition across the range of packing densities.
AB - Flow over arrays of cubes is an extensively studied model problem for rough wall turbulent boundary layers. While considerable research has been performed in computationally investigating these topologies using DNS and LES, the ability of sublayer-resolved RANS to predict the bulk flow phenomena of these systems is relatively unexplored, especially at low and high packing densities. Here, RANS simulations are conducted on six different packing densities of cubes in aligned and staggered configurations. The packing densities investigated span from what would classically be defined as isolated, up to those in the dtype roughness regime, filling in the gap in the present literature. Three different sublayer-resolved turbulence closure models were tested for each case; a low Reynolds number k-e model, the Menter k-w SST model, and a full Reynolds stress model. Comparisons of the velocity fields, secondary flow features, and drag coefficients are made between the RANS results and existing LES and DNS results. There is a significant degree of variability in the performance of the various RANS models across all comparison metrics. However, the Reynolds stress model demonstrated the best accuracy in terms of the mean velocity profile as well as drag partition across the range of packing densities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116616560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85116616560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/FEDSM2021-65494
DO - 10.1115/FEDSM2021-65494
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85116616560
T3 - American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division (Publication) FEDSM
BT - Fluid Mechanics; Micro and Nano Fluid Dynamics; Multiphase Flow
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Y2 - 10 August 2021 through 12 August 2021
ER -