TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling of cytometry data in logarithmic space
T2 - When is a bimodal distribution not bimodal?
AU - Erez, Amir
AU - Vogel, Robert
AU - Mugler, Andrew
AU - Belmonte, Andrew
AU - Altan-Bonnet, Grégoire
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Human Frontier Science Program grant LT000123/2014 (Amir Erez) and by the Intramural Research Program of the NCI, NIH.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Recent efforts in systems immunology lead researchers to build quantitative models of cell activation and differentiation. One goal is to account for the distributions of proteins from single-cell measurements by flow cytometry or mass cytometry as readout of biological regulation. In that context, large cell-to-cell variability is often observed in biological quantities. We show here that these readouts, viewed in logarithmic scale may result in two easily-distinguishable modes, while the underlying distribution (in linear scale) is unimodal. We introduce a simple mathematical test to highlight this mismatch. We then dissect the flow of influence of cell-to-cell variability proposing a graphical model which motivates higher-dimensional analysis of the data. Finally we show how acquiring additional biological information can be used to reduce uncertainty introduced by cell-to-cell variability, helping to clarify whether the data is uni- or bimodal. This communication has cautionary implications for manual and automatic gating strategies, as well as clustering and modeling of single-cell measurements.
AB - Recent efforts in systems immunology lead researchers to build quantitative models of cell activation and differentiation. One goal is to account for the distributions of proteins from single-cell measurements by flow cytometry or mass cytometry as readout of biological regulation. In that context, large cell-to-cell variability is often observed in biological quantities. We show here that these readouts, viewed in logarithmic scale may result in two easily-distinguishable modes, while the underlying distribution (in linear scale) is unimodal. We introduce a simple mathematical test to highlight this mismatch. We then dissect the flow of influence of cell-to-cell variability proposing a graphical model which motivates higher-dimensional analysis of the data. Finally we show how acquiring additional biological information can be used to reduce uncertainty introduced by cell-to-cell variability, helping to clarify whether the data is uni- or bimodal. This communication has cautionary implications for manual and automatic gating strategies, as well as clustering and modeling of single-cell measurements.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042094890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042094890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cyto.a.23333
DO - 10.1002/cyto.a.23333
M3 - Article
C2 - 29451717
AN - SCOPUS:85042094890
SN - 1552-4922
VL - 93
SP - 611
EP - 619
JO - Cytometry Part A
JF - Cytometry Part A
IS - 6
ER -