TY - JOUR
T1 - Monitoring treatment of central precocious puberty using basal luteinizing hormone levels and practical considerations for dosing with a 3-month leuprolide acetate formulation
AU - Lee, Peter
AU - Luce, Margaret
AU - Bacher, Peter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Background: Peak gonadotropin-releasing hormone or agonist (GnRHa) stimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) testing with leuprolide acetate (LA) is commonly used to document suppression during therapy for central precocious puberty (CPP). The objective of the study was to investigate suitability of using basal LH levels to monitor GnRHa treatment and to determine optimal transition from 1-month to 3-month LA formulations via a post hoc analysis of a randomized, open-label, 6-month study. Methods: A total of 42 children with CPP, pretreated with 7.5-, 11.25-, or 15-mg 1-month LA formulations were randomized to 11.25- or 30-mg 3-month LA. Basal LH/peakstimulated LH levels were measured at weeks 0, 4, 8 and 12. Positive/negative predictive values and sensitivities/specificities were determined for basal LH vs. LH-stimulation results. Results: Pretreatment with any 1-month formulation for the most part did not affect continuation of suppression after transitioning to 3-month formulation (mean peakstimulated LH levels remained < 4 IU/L). Basal LH predicted suppression escape (basal LH-level cutoff ≥ 0.6 IU/L predicted 70% of those failing suppression). Tolerability was similar, regardless of dose. Conclusions: Our data indicate that a basal level of < 0.60 IU/L is adequate for monitoring suppression approximately two-thirds of the time. Furthermore, the effectiveness and safety of 3-month LA treatments are not influenced by previous CPP therapies.
AB - Background: Peak gonadotropin-releasing hormone or agonist (GnRHa) stimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) testing with leuprolide acetate (LA) is commonly used to document suppression during therapy for central precocious puberty (CPP). The objective of the study was to investigate suitability of using basal LH levels to monitor GnRHa treatment and to determine optimal transition from 1-month to 3-month LA formulations via a post hoc analysis of a randomized, open-label, 6-month study. Methods: A total of 42 children with CPP, pretreated with 7.5-, 11.25-, or 15-mg 1-month LA formulations were randomized to 11.25- or 30-mg 3-month LA. Basal LH/peakstimulated LH levels were measured at weeks 0, 4, 8 and 12. Positive/negative predictive values and sensitivities/specificities were determined for basal LH vs. LH-stimulation results. Results: Pretreatment with any 1-month formulation for the most part did not affect continuation of suppression after transitioning to 3-month formulation (mean peakstimulated LH levels remained < 4 IU/L). Basal LH predicted suppression escape (basal LH-level cutoff ≥ 0.6 IU/L predicted 70% of those failing suppression). Tolerability was similar, regardless of dose. Conclusions: Our data indicate that a basal level of < 0.60 IU/L is adequate for monitoring suppression approximately two-thirds of the time. Furthermore, the effectiveness and safety of 3-month LA treatments are not influenced by previous CPP therapies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994890063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994890063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/jpem-2016-0026
DO - 10.1515/jpem-2016-0026
M3 - Article
C2 - 27740929
AN - SCOPUS:84994890063
SN - 0334-018X
VL - 29
SP - 1249
EP - 1257
JO - Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism
JF - Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism
IS - 11
ER -