TY - JOUR
T1 - Mortality of centrarchid fishes in the potomac drainage
T2 - Survey results and overview of potential contributing factors
AU - Blazer, V. S.
AU - Iwanowicz, L. R.
AU - Starliper, C. E.
AU - Iwanowicz, D. D.
AU - Barbash, P.
AU - Hedrick, J. D.
AU - Reeser, S. J.
AU - Mullican, J. E.
AU - Zaugg, S. D.
AU - Burkhardt, M. R.
AU - Kelble, J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We are indebted to the numerous field biologists and others from agencies in the states of West Virginia, Maryland, and Virginia who assisted in field collections. We thank Darlene Bowling, Kathy Spring, and Pam Whittington (U.S. Geological Survey [USGS]) and Richard Gunsalles and William Quartz (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) for technical assistance and Heather Ellery (USGS) and Lisa Cullinane (Virginia Department of Environmental Quality) for assistance with field necropsies and laboratory assistance. Rocco Cipriano (USGS) identified the bacteria cultured from skin mucous in 2007, and John Young (USGS) produced the map used in Figure 1.The research was funded by the U.S. Geological Survey’s Chesapeake Bay Ecosystem, Toxic Substances, Hydrology, and Fisheries programs, Virginia’s Department of Environmental Quality and Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, West Virginia’s Department of Environmental Protection and Division of Natural Resources, and Maryland’s Department of Natural Resources, as well as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In addition, the Friends of the Shenandoah provided funding for the tissue arsenic analyses. We also appreciate the manuscript review and comments of John Holmes, Friends of the North Fork; Paul Bowser, Cornell University; John Fournie, Environmental Protection Agency; and Christopher Ottinger, USGS. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Skin lesions and spring mortality events of smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu and selected other species were first noted in the South Branch of the Potomac River in 2002. Since that year morbidity and mortality have also been observed in the Shenandoah and Monocacy rivers. Despite much research, no single pathogen, parasite, or chemical cause for the lesions and mortality has been identified. Numerous parasites, most commonly trematode metacercariae and myxozoans; the bacterial pathogens Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas salmonicida, and Flavobacterium columnare; and largemouth bass virus have all been observed. None have been consistently isolated or observed at all sites, however, nor has any consistent microscopic pathology of the lesions been observed. A variety of histological changes associated with exposure to environmental contaminants or stressors, including intersex (testicular oocytes), high numbers of macrophage aggregates, oxidative damage, gill lesions, and epidermal papillomas, were observed. The findings indicate that selected sensitive species may be stressed by multiple factors and constantly close to the threshold between a sustainable (healthy) and nonsustainable (unhealthy) condition. Fish health is often used as an indicator of aquatic ecosystem health, and these findings raise concerns about environmental degradation within the Potomac River drainage. Unfortunately, while much information has been gained fromthe studies conducted to date, due to the multiple state jurisdictions involved, competing interests, and other issues, there has been no coordinated approach to identifying and mitigating the stressors. This synthesis emphasizes the need for multiyear, interdisciplinary, integrative research to identify the underlying stressors and possible management actions to enhance ecosystem health.
AB - Skin lesions and spring mortality events of smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu and selected other species were first noted in the South Branch of the Potomac River in 2002. Since that year morbidity and mortality have also been observed in the Shenandoah and Monocacy rivers. Despite much research, no single pathogen, parasite, or chemical cause for the lesions and mortality has been identified. Numerous parasites, most commonly trematode metacercariae and myxozoans; the bacterial pathogens Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas salmonicida, and Flavobacterium columnare; and largemouth bass virus have all been observed. None have been consistently isolated or observed at all sites, however, nor has any consistent microscopic pathology of the lesions been observed. A variety of histological changes associated with exposure to environmental contaminants or stressors, including intersex (testicular oocytes), high numbers of macrophage aggregates, oxidative damage, gill lesions, and epidermal papillomas, were observed. The findings indicate that selected sensitive species may be stressed by multiple factors and constantly close to the threshold between a sustainable (healthy) and nonsustainable (unhealthy) condition. Fish health is often used as an indicator of aquatic ecosystem health, and these findings raise concerns about environmental degradation within the Potomac River drainage. Unfortunately, while much information has been gained fromthe studies conducted to date, due to the multiple state jurisdictions involved, competing interests, and other issues, there has been no coordinated approach to identifying and mitigating the stressors. This synthesis emphasizes the need for multiyear, interdisciplinary, integrative research to identify the underlying stressors and possible management actions to enhance ecosystem health.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952201434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952201434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1577/H10-002.1
DO - 10.1577/H10-002.1
M3 - Article
C2 - 21192549
AN - SCOPUS:79952201434
SN - 0899-7659
VL - 22
SP - 190
EP - 218
JO - Journal of Aquatic Animal Health
JF - Journal of Aquatic Animal Health
IS - 3
ER -