TY - JOUR
T1 - Motion picture production incentives and filming location decisions
T2 - A discrete choice approach
AU - Owens, Mark F.
AU - Rennhoff, Adam D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected]
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - We use a discrete choice model to study the impact of tax incentives on firm location choices in situations involving heterogeneous geographic characteristics, heterogeneous firm preferences and large choice sets. We apply our model to investigate the impact of movie production incentives on filming location choices for movies produced from 1999 to 2013. We gather the characteristics of filming locations and use a machine-learning technique to define choice sets. We find production incentives can attract movies to a state, but the impact depends on the type of incentive offered, studio characteristics and inherent location geographic characteristics. Mid-sized studios respond to all forms of incentives, major studios respond only to refundable and transferable tax credits, and independent studios are not sensitive to any incentives. We fail to find strong evidence that incentives create a more permanent movie industry in a state. A counterfactual identifies the states most impacted by these policies. We supplement our discrete choice model with a simple cost-benefit analysis, which indicates that movie incentive programs are revenue-negative for states.
AB - We use a discrete choice model to study the impact of tax incentives on firm location choices in situations involving heterogeneous geographic characteristics, heterogeneous firm preferences and large choice sets. We apply our model to investigate the impact of movie production incentives on filming location choices for movies produced from 1999 to 2013. We gather the characteristics of filming locations and use a machine-learning technique to define choice sets. We find production incentives can attract movies to a state, but the impact depends on the type of incentive offered, studio characteristics and inherent location geographic characteristics. Mid-sized studios respond to all forms of incentives, major studios respond only to refundable and transferable tax credits, and independent studios are not sensitive to any incentives. We fail to find strong evidence that incentives create a more permanent movie industry in a state. A counterfactual identifies the states most impacted by these policies. We supplement our discrete choice model with a simple cost-benefit analysis, which indicates that movie incentive programs are revenue-negative for states.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101449577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101449577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/JEG/LBY054
DO - 10.1093/JEG/LBY054
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85101449577
SN - 1468-2702
VL - 20
SP - 679
EP - 709
JO - Journal of Economic Geography
JF - Journal of Economic Geography
IS - 3
ER -