Multi-method research in the digital age: A methodological case study of a broad-scale rapid rural appraisal

Jason Entsminger, John J. Green, Renee Wiatt, Zuzana Bednarik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article presents a methodological case conceptualized de novo during the pandemic to identify priorities for investment in rural community development. To achieve project objectives, traditional research approaches were adapted to an entirely virtual setting. The project was a two-stage, mixed-methods rapid appraisal process, with data analyzed using the Community Capitals Framework. First, an online survey was conducted, collecting responses from rural community development practitioners across the U.S. Second, quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted to identify rural development priority areas. Results were used to design and facilitate virtual dialogue sessions with key informants to inventory assets, challenges, and opportunities in rural communities. Dialogue outcomes contributed to identifying priority areas for national and regional investments in rural development. This article opens dialogue within the field on community-engaged research in the digital age. Lessons learned include challenges of institutional trust, broadband access, and methodological modifications to accommodate virtual settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCommunity Development
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-method research in the digital age: A methodological case study of a broad-scale rapid rural appraisal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this