TY - CONF
T1 - Multi-well analytical solution for coning under simultaneous steady-state flow of three phases
AU - Ahn, Eunnam
AU - Johns, Russell T.
AU - Phaiboonpalayoi, Chonpatin
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the member companies of the Enhanced Oil Recovery JIP in the EMS Energy Institute at The Pennsylvania State University at University Park, PA for their financial support. Dr. Russell T. Johns holds the George E. Trimble Chair in Earth and Mineral Sciences and the Energi Simulation Chair in Fluid Behavior and Rock Interactions at Penn State. The authors would also like to acknowledge Daulet Magzymov for his technical discussions and review of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Unwanted water or gas production from upward or downward coning can significantly Erode profits in oil recovery processes. Simulation estimates of the magnitude and timing of coning can be erroneous owing to unknown reservoir heterogeneity, large grid blocks near the wells, and inaccuracies in simulation well models, such as that from Peaceman. This paper presents a multi-well steady-state analytical solution for coning of three phases (oil, water, and gas) flowing simultaneously. The solution for multiple wells is developed using superposition with a coning potential function that includes capillary pressure and relative permeability. The assumption of vertical equilibrium (VE) is made, which gives maximum crossflow vertically and therefore the largest possible coning. Any model for relative permeability and capillary pressure can be used, although we used Stone 2 for relative permeability and Brooks-Corey for capillary pressure. The solution is important to benchmark numerical solutions and potentially improve the accuracy of Peaceman's well model. Further, we give inflow performance windows (IPW) to show the allowable physical window of three-phase rates and the maximum oil rate as a function of the water and gas rates. The new potential functions are also used to demonstrate superposition for two production wells in a reservoir with perpendicular no flow boundaries.
AB - Unwanted water or gas production from upward or downward coning can significantly Erode profits in oil recovery processes. Simulation estimates of the magnitude and timing of coning can be erroneous owing to unknown reservoir heterogeneity, large grid blocks near the wells, and inaccuracies in simulation well models, such as that from Peaceman. This paper presents a multi-well steady-state analytical solution for coning of three phases (oil, water, and gas) flowing simultaneously. The solution for multiple wells is developed using superposition with a coning potential function that includes capillary pressure and relative permeability. The assumption of vertical equilibrium (VE) is made, which gives maximum crossflow vertically and therefore the largest possible coning. Any model for relative permeability and capillary pressure can be used, although we used Stone 2 for relative permeability and Brooks-Corey for capillary pressure. The solution is important to benchmark numerical solutions and potentially improve the accuracy of Peaceman's well model. Further, we give inflow performance windows (IPW) to show the allowable physical window of three-phase rates and the maximum oil rate as a function of the water and gas rates. The new potential functions are also used to demonstrate superposition for two production wells in a reservoir with perpendicular no flow boundaries.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050487367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050487367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2118/190182-ms
DO - 10.2118/190182-ms
M3 - Paper
AN - SCOPUS:85050487367
T2 - SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference 2018
Y2 - 14 April 2018 through 18 April 2018
ER -