TY - GEN
T1 - Multicast vs. unicast for loss tomography on tree topologies
AU - Liu, Chang
AU - He, Ting
AU - Swami, Ananthram
AU - Towsley, Don
AU - Salonidis, Theodoros
AU - Bejan, Andrei Iu
AU - Yu, Paul
PY - 2015/12/14
Y1 - 2015/12/14
N2 - Loss tomography using multicast measurements and using unicast measurements have been investigated separately. In this paper we compare the performance of the two methods on tree structures. We prove identifiability of unicast measurements on tree structures with no degree-2 nodes. To theoretically compare multicast and unicast, we develop an observation model for multicast on trees and derive expressions for calculating the Fisher Information Matrix. We apply optimal experiment design for unicast on trees and develop a simple and insightful solution. Using a packet level simulator, we evaluated and compared the per-link MSE of multicast and unicast under varying parameter settings including link weights, link success rates and tree size. The results show that in contrast to the general belief that multicast always outperforms unicast, unicast can outperform multicast under tight constraint on the probing budget, especially in terms of a weighted average of per-link MSEs. On the other hand, multicast achieves more consistent performance with respect to varying link success rates or tree size.
AB - Loss tomography using multicast measurements and using unicast measurements have been investigated separately. In this paper we compare the performance of the two methods on tree structures. We prove identifiability of unicast measurements on tree structures with no degree-2 nodes. To theoretically compare multicast and unicast, we develop an observation model for multicast on trees and derive expressions for calculating the Fisher Information Matrix. We apply optimal experiment design for unicast on trees and develop a simple and insightful solution. Using a packet level simulator, we evaluated and compared the per-link MSE of multicast and unicast under varying parameter settings including link weights, link success rates and tree size. The results show that in contrast to the general belief that multicast always outperforms unicast, unicast can outperform multicast under tight constraint on the probing budget, especially in terms of a weighted average of per-link MSEs. On the other hand, multicast achieves more consistent performance with respect to varying link success rates or tree size.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959309630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959309630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/MILCOM.2015.7357461
DO - 10.1109/MILCOM.2015.7357461
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84959309630
T3 - Proceedings - IEEE Military Communications Conference MILCOM
SP - 312
EP - 317
BT - 2015 IEEE Military Communications Conference, MILCOM 2015
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 34th Annual IEEE Military Communications Conference, MILCOM 2015
Y2 - 26 October 2015 through 28 October 2015
ER -