Multidisciplinary ALS clinics in the USA: A comparison of those who attend and those who do not

Helen E. Stephens, Stephanie Felgoise, Jared Young, Zachary Simmons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations


Optimization of quality of life (QoL) is perceived by many as the primary goal for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), often via multidisciplinary clinics (MDCs). The aim of this study was to examine the differences in QoL, physical function, and social problem-solving skills for individuals with ALS attending MDCs compared to non-Attenders. An online survey was completed by 295 people with ALS in the United States. Results showed there were no differences between the groups in global QoL, measures of physical function, or social problem-solving skills. Attenders and non-Attenders of MDCs reported similar use of treatments for their ALS, although attenders received more health care services from nurses, therapists, social workers, dieticians, and in-home care providers. In conclusion, oher instruments may be needed to assess the benefits of MDCs. Qualitative studies of attenders and non-Attenders of MDCs may reveal important differences that could guide care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)196-201
Number of pages6
JournalAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
Issue number3-4
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology


Dive into the research topics of 'Multidisciplinary ALS clinics in the USA: A comparison of those who attend and those who do not'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this