TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple-criteria location selection for wood kiln operations using AHP/TOPSIS
AU - Gargari, Rahim Mohebbi
AU - Azizi, Majid
AU - Ray, Charles D.
AU - Tarmian, Asghar
AU - Samghabadi, Azam Dokht Safi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - This study attempted to determine a suitable combination of multiple-criteria selection techniques for the best location for wood drying kiln operations in Iran. Utilising field studies across the wood-drying industry, limitations of existing selection-method criteria were identified, and a hierarchy of decision-making factors and weights was designed utilising AHP to overcome those limitations. The alternatives were then prioritised using fuzzy TOPSIS. Results indicate that a location in the province of Mazandaran is the best solution. In validation, the results from fuzzy TOPSIS were compared with the results from interview questionnaires in relation to priority alternatives. This validation demonstrates that the results of the fuzzy TOPSIS were confirmed in the resultant order with an acceptable rate of error. Moreover, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient of the results of alternative priorities with two methods of fuzzy TOPSIS and the interview questionnaires (99.23%) indicated that there was a strong positive correlation between the results.
AB - This study attempted to determine a suitable combination of multiple-criteria selection techniques for the best location for wood drying kiln operations in Iran. Utilising field studies across the wood-drying industry, limitations of existing selection-method criteria were identified, and a hierarchy of decision-making factors and weights was designed utilising AHP to overcome those limitations. The alternatives were then prioritised using fuzzy TOPSIS. Results indicate that a location in the province of Mazandaran is the best solution. In validation, the results from fuzzy TOPSIS were compared with the results from interview questionnaires in relation to priority alternatives. This validation demonstrates that the results of the fuzzy TOPSIS were confirmed in the resultant order with an acceptable rate of error. Moreover, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient of the results of alternative priorities with two methods of fuzzy TOPSIS and the interview questionnaires (99.23%) indicated that there was a strong positive correlation between the results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109481453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109481453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1504/IJBSR.2021.115991
DO - 10.1504/IJBSR.2021.115991
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85109481453
SN - 1751-200X
VL - 15
SP - 448
EP - 467
JO - International Journal of Business and Systems Research
JF - International Journal of Business and Systems Research
IS - 4
ER -