TY - JOUR
T1 - Multivariate linear discrimination of seizures
AU - Jerger, Kristin K.
AU - Weinstein, Steven L.
AU - Sauer, Tim
AU - Schiff, Steven J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Work supported by NIH grants K02MH01493 and R01MH50006.
PY - 2005/3
Y1 - 2005/3
N2 - Objective: To discriminate seizures from interictal dynamics based on multivariate synchrony measures, and to identify dynamics of a pre-seizure state. Methods: A linear discriminator was constructed from two different measures of synchronization: cross-correlation and phase synchronization. We applied this discriminator to a sequence of seizures recorded from the intracranial EEG of a patient monitored over 6 days. Results: Surprisingly, we found that this bivariate measure of synchronization was not a reliable seizure discriminator for 7 of 9 seizures. Furthermore, the method did not appear to reliably detect a pre-seizure state. An association between anti-convulsant dosage, frequency of clinical seizures, and discriminator performance was noted. Conclusions: Using a bivariate measure of synchronization failed to reliably differentiate seizures from non-seizure periods in these data, nor did such methods show reliable detection of a synchronous pre-seizure state. The non-stationary variables of decreasing antiepileptic medication (without available serum concentration measurements), and concomitant increasing seizure frequency contributed to the difficulties in validating a seizure prediction tool on such data. Significance: The finding that these seizures were not a simple reflection of increasing synchronization in the EEG has important implications. The non-stationary characteristics of human post-implantation intracranial EEG is an inherent limitation of pre-resection data sets.
AB - Objective: To discriminate seizures from interictal dynamics based on multivariate synchrony measures, and to identify dynamics of a pre-seizure state. Methods: A linear discriminator was constructed from two different measures of synchronization: cross-correlation and phase synchronization. We applied this discriminator to a sequence of seizures recorded from the intracranial EEG of a patient monitored over 6 days. Results: Surprisingly, we found that this bivariate measure of synchronization was not a reliable seizure discriminator for 7 of 9 seizures. Furthermore, the method did not appear to reliably detect a pre-seizure state. An association between anti-convulsant dosage, frequency of clinical seizures, and discriminator performance was noted. Conclusions: Using a bivariate measure of synchronization failed to reliably differentiate seizures from non-seizure periods in these data, nor did such methods show reliable detection of a synchronous pre-seizure state. The non-stationary variables of decreasing antiepileptic medication (without available serum concentration measurements), and concomitant increasing seizure frequency contributed to the difficulties in validating a seizure prediction tool on such data. Significance: The finding that these seizures were not a simple reflection of increasing synchronization in the EEG has important implications. The non-stationary characteristics of human post-implantation intracranial EEG is an inherent limitation of pre-resection data sets.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13844294484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13844294484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.08.023
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.08.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 15721068
AN - SCOPUS:13844294484
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 116
SP - 545
EP - 551
JO - Clinical Neurophysiology
JF - Clinical Neurophysiology
IS - 3
ER -