TY - JOUR
T1 - Mutation status among patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma and its impact on survival
AU - Amit, Moran
AU - Tam, Samantha
AU - Abdelmeguid, Ahmed S.
AU - Roberts, Dianna B.
AU - Takahashi, Yoko
AU - Raza, Shaan M.
AU - Su, Shirley Y.
AU - Kupferman, Michael E.
AU - Demonte, Franco
AU - Hanna, Ehab Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Author(s).
PY - 2017/6/6
Y1 - 2017/6/6
N2 - Background:Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) comprises <1% of all melanomas and lacks well-characterised molecular markers. Our aim was to determine the frequencies of common mutations and examine their utility as molecular markers in a large series of primary SNMMs.Methods:SNMM patients seen at our institution from August 1991 through July 2016 were identified. Genomic DNA was extracted from 66 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumours and screened for mutations by direct sequencing. We investigated the association of mutations with clinicopathological features and survival outcomes.Results:Overall, 41% (27 out of 66) of the SNMMs harboured mutations. BRAF and KIT mutations were identified in 8% (five patients) and 5% (three patients) of SNMMs, respectively, whereas NRAS mutations were detected in 30% (20 patients) of SNMMs. Mutation rates in these oncogenes were similar between SNMMs located in the paranasal sinuses and those in the nasal cavity (30% and 13%, respectively, P=0.09). In a multivariate analysis, patients with negative margins had significantly better overall survival (hazard ratio 5.43, 95% confidence interval 1.44-21.85, P=0.01) and disease-specific survival (hazard ratio 21.9, 95% confidence interval 3.71-180, P=0.0004). The mutation status of the tumours showed no association with survival outcomes.Conclusions:In SNNM, mutation status does not affect survival outcomes, but NRAS mutations are relatively frequent and could be targeted in this disease by MEK inhibitors.
AB - Background:Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) comprises <1% of all melanomas and lacks well-characterised molecular markers. Our aim was to determine the frequencies of common mutations and examine their utility as molecular markers in a large series of primary SNMMs.Methods:SNMM patients seen at our institution from August 1991 through July 2016 were identified. Genomic DNA was extracted from 66 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumours and screened for mutations by direct sequencing. We investigated the association of mutations with clinicopathological features and survival outcomes.Results:Overall, 41% (27 out of 66) of the SNMMs harboured mutations. BRAF and KIT mutations were identified in 8% (five patients) and 5% (three patients) of SNMMs, respectively, whereas NRAS mutations were detected in 30% (20 patients) of SNMMs. Mutation rates in these oncogenes were similar between SNMMs located in the paranasal sinuses and those in the nasal cavity (30% and 13%, respectively, P=0.09). In a multivariate analysis, patients with negative margins had significantly better overall survival (hazard ratio 5.43, 95% confidence interval 1.44-21.85, P=0.01) and disease-specific survival (hazard ratio 21.9, 95% confidence interval 3.71-180, P=0.0004). The mutation status of the tumours showed no association with survival outcomes.Conclusions:In SNNM, mutation status does not affect survival outcomes, but NRAS mutations are relatively frequent and could be targeted in this disease by MEK inhibitors.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85020481786
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85020481786#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1038/bjc.2017.125
DO - 10.1038/bjc.2017.125
M3 - Article
C2 - 28494469
AN - SCOPUS:85020481786
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 116
SP - 1564
EP - 1571
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 12
ER -