TY - JOUR
T1 - Mycophenolate mofetil
T2 - Fully utilizing its benefits for GvHD prophylaxis
AU - Minagawa, Kentaro
AU - Yamamori, Motohiro
AU - Katayama, Yoshio
AU - Matsui, Toshimitsu
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/7
Y1 - 2012/7
N2 - Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been widely used for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), based on clinical evidence established in organ transplantations. MMF is not a cytotoxic, but rather a cytostatic agent, and there have been several reports of significant advantages in engraftment as well as greatly reduced stomatitis compared to methotrexate (MTX). MMF has been preferred for MTX-free immunosuppression, especially in reduced intensity conditioning, but it is suitable for GvHD prophylaxis for any type of HSCT. Some clinicians doubt its effectiveness, due to the lack of advantage over MTX in acute GvHD prophylaxis, especially in myeloablative conditioning. Pharmacokinetics studies of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active form of MMF, show large inter- and intra-patient variation, which make interpretations of its clinical usefulness difficult. Nevertheless, several studies, including ours, have demonstrated that relatively higher area under the curve (AUC) of the MPA group leads to significant suppression of acute GvHD in prophylactic use. We propose a model algorithm for optimal dose finding using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for MPA. Preemptive strategies depending on plasma MPA levels could yield more effective approaches to GvHD prophylaxis, alternative to MTX.
AB - Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been widely used for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), based on clinical evidence established in organ transplantations. MMF is not a cytotoxic, but rather a cytostatic agent, and there have been several reports of significant advantages in engraftment as well as greatly reduced stomatitis compared to methotrexate (MTX). MMF has been preferred for MTX-free immunosuppression, especially in reduced intensity conditioning, but it is suitable for GvHD prophylaxis for any type of HSCT. Some clinicians doubt its effectiveness, due to the lack of advantage over MTX in acute GvHD prophylaxis, especially in myeloablative conditioning. Pharmacokinetics studies of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active form of MMF, show large inter- and intra-patient variation, which make interpretations of its clinical usefulness difficult. Nevertheless, several studies, including ours, have demonstrated that relatively higher area under the curve (AUC) of the MPA group leads to significant suppression of acute GvHD in prophylactic use. We propose a model algorithm for optimal dose finding using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for MPA. Preemptive strategies depending on plasma MPA levels could yield more effective approaches to GvHD prophylaxis, alternative to MTX.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864965578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864965578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12185-012-1086-x
DO - 10.1007/s12185-012-1086-x
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22592321
AN - SCOPUS:84864965578
SN - 0925-5710
VL - 96
SP - 10
EP - 25
JO - International journal of hematology
JF - International journal of hematology
IS - 1
ER -