TY - JOUR
T1 - National Crimes
T2 - A New National Data Set of Lynchings in the United States, 1883 to 1941
AU - Seguin, Charles
AU - Rigby, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© SAGE Publications Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Historians are increasingly studying lynching outside of the American Southeast, but sociologists have been slow to follow. We introduce a new public data set that extends existing data on lynching victims to cover the contiguous United States from 1883 to 1941. These data confirm that lynching was a heterogeneous practice across the United States. We differentiate between three different regimes over this period: a Wild West regime, characterized mostly by the lynching of whites in areas with weak state penetration; a slavery regime, found in former slave states, characterized mostly by the lynching of blacks; and a third minor regime, characterized by the lynching of Mexican nationals mostly along the Texas-Mexico border. We also note great variability at the county level in the extent of lynching. By contrast, we find very little state-level variability in lynching once local and regional regimes are considered. We discuss the implications of local and regional heterogeneity for quantitative lynching research using these data.
AB - Historians are increasingly studying lynching outside of the American Southeast, but sociologists have been slow to follow. We introduce a new public data set that extends existing data on lynching victims to cover the contiguous United States from 1883 to 1941. These data confirm that lynching was a heterogeneous practice across the United States. We differentiate between three different regimes over this period: a Wild West regime, characterized mostly by the lynching of whites in areas with weak state penetration; a slavery regime, found in former slave states, characterized mostly by the lynching of blacks; and a third minor regime, characterized by the lynching of Mexican nationals mostly along the Texas-Mexico border. We also note great variability at the county level in the extent of lynching. By contrast, we find very little state-level variability in lynching once local and regional regimes are considered. We discuss the implications of local and regional heterogeneity for quantitative lynching research using these data.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85094892479
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85094892479#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1177/2378023119841780
DO - 10.1177/2378023119841780
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85094892479
SN - 2378-0231
VL - 5
JO - Socius
JF - Socius
M1 - 2378023119841780
ER -