Abstract
Historians are increasingly studying lynching outside of the American Southeast, but sociologists have been slow to follow. We introduce a new public data set that extends existing data on lynching victims to cover the contiguous United States from 1883 to 1941. These data confirm that lynching was a heterogeneous practice across the United States. We differentiate between three different regimes over this period: a Wild West regime, characterized mostly by the lynching of whites in areas with weak state penetration; a slavery regime, found in former slave states, characterized mostly by the lynching of blacks; and a third minor regime, characterized by the lynching of Mexican nationals mostly along the Texas-Mexico border. We also note great variability at the county level in the extent of lynching. By contrast, we find very little state-level variability in lynching once local and regional regimes are considered. We discuss the implications of local and regional heterogeneity for quantitative lynching research using these data.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 2378023119841780 |
| Journal | Socius |
| Volume | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2019 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'National Crimes: A New National Data Set of Lynchings in the United States, 1883 to 1941'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver