TY - GEN
T1 - Near-optimal lower bounds on the threshold degree and sign-rank of AC0
AU - Sherstov, Alexander A.
AU - Wu, Pei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Association for Computing Machinery.
PY - 2019/6/23
Y1 - 2019/6/23
N2 - The threshold degree of a Boolean function f : (0, 1)n → (0, 1) is the minimum degree of a real polynomial p that represents f in sign: sgn p(x) = (−1)f (x). A related notion is sign-rank, defined for a Boolean matrix F = [Fij] as the minimum rank of a real matrix M with sgn Mij = (−1)Fij . Determining the maximum threshold degree and sign-rank achievable by constant-depth circuits (AC0) is a well-known and extensively studied open problem, with complexity-theoretic and algorithmic applications. We give an essentially optimal solution to this problem. For any ϵ > 0, we construct an AC0 circuit in n variables that has threshold degree Ω(n1−ϵ) and sign-rank exp(Ω(n1−ϵ)), improving on the previous best lower bounds of Ω(n) and exp(Ω (n)), respectively. Our results subsume all previous lower bounds on the threshold degree and sign-rank of AC0 circuits of any given depth, with a strict improvement starting at depth 4. As a corollary, we also obtain near-optimal bounds on the discrepancy, threshold weight, and threshold density of AC0, strictly subsuming previous work on these quantities. Our work gives some of the strongest lower bounds to date on the communication complexity of AC0.
AB - The threshold degree of a Boolean function f : (0, 1)n → (0, 1) is the minimum degree of a real polynomial p that represents f in sign: sgn p(x) = (−1)f (x). A related notion is sign-rank, defined for a Boolean matrix F = [Fij] as the minimum rank of a real matrix M with sgn Mij = (−1)Fij . Determining the maximum threshold degree and sign-rank achievable by constant-depth circuits (AC0) is a well-known and extensively studied open problem, with complexity-theoretic and algorithmic applications. We give an essentially optimal solution to this problem. For any ϵ > 0, we construct an AC0 circuit in n variables that has threshold degree Ω(n1−ϵ) and sign-rank exp(Ω(n1−ϵ)), improving on the previous best lower bounds of Ω(n) and exp(Ω (n)), respectively. Our results subsume all previous lower bounds on the threshold degree and sign-rank of AC0 circuits of any given depth, with a strict improvement starting at depth 4. As a corollary, we also obtain near-optimal bounds on the discrepancy, threshold weight, and threshold density of AC0, strictly subsuming previous work on these quantities. Our work gives some of the strongest lower bounds to date on the communication complexity of AC0.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068763356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068763356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3313276.3316408
DO - 10.1145/3313276.3316408
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85068763356
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
SP - 401
EP - 412
BT - STOC 2019 - Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing
A2 - Charikar, Moses
A2 - Cohen, Edith
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
T2 - 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2019
Y2 - 23 June 2019 through 26 June 2019
ER -