TY - JOUR
T1 - Neural responses to perceiving suffering in humans and animals
AU - Franklin, Robert G.
AU - Nelson, Anthony J.
AU - Baker, Michelle
AU - Beeney, Joseph E.
AU - Vescio, Theresa K.
AU - Lenz-Watson, Aurora
AU - Adams, Reginald B.
N1 - Funding Information:
Correspondence should be addressed to: Robert G. Franklin, Jr., Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Mailstop 062, Waltham, MA 02454, USA. E-mail: [email protected] and Reginald B. Adams, Jr., Department of Psychology, 464 Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA. E-mail: [email protected] This research was supported by a Social Science Research Institute grant, Penn State University, to R. B. A., Jr. We acknowledge Amanda Gearhart and David Pennell for their help with data collection and Jasmine Boshyan for her helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - The human ability to perceive and understand others' suffering is critical to reinforcing and maintaining our social bonds. What is not clear, however, is the extent to which this generalizes to nonhuman entities. Anecdotal evidence indicates that people may engage in empathy-like processes when observing suffering nonhuman entities, but psychological research suggests that we more readily empathize with those to whom we are closer and more similar. In this research, we examined neural responses in participants while they were presented with pictures of human versus dog suffering. We found that viewing human and animal suffering led to large overlapping regions of activation previously implicated in empathic responding to suffering, including the anterior cingulate gyrus and anterior insula. Direct comparisons of viewing human and animal suffering also revealed differences such that human suffering yielded significantly greater medial prefrontal activation, consistent with high-level theory of mind, whereas animal suffering yielded significantly greater parietal and inferior frontal activation, consistent with more semantic evaluation and perceptual simulation.
AB - The human ability to perceive and understand others' suffering is critical to reinforcing and maintaining our social bonds. What is not clear, however, is the extent to which this generalizes to nonhuman entities. Anecdotal evidence indicates that people may engage in empathy-like processes when observing suffering nonhuman entities, but psychological research suggests that we more readily empathize with those to whom we are closer and more similar. In this research, we examined neural responses in participants while they were presented with pictures of human versus dog suffering. We found that viewing human and animal suffering led to large overlapping regions of activation previously implicated in empathic responding to suffering, including the anterior cingulate gyrus and anterior insula. Direct comparisons of viewing human and animal suffering also revealed differences such that human suffering yielded significantly greater medial prefrontal activation, consistent with high-level theory of mind, whereas animal suffering yielded significantly greater parietal and inferior frontal activation, consistent with more semantic evaluation and perceptual simulation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876103623&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876103623&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17470919.2013.763852
DO - 10.1080/17470919.2013.763852
M3 - Article
C2 - 23405957
AN - SCOPUS:84876103623
SN - 1747-0919
VL - 8
SP - 217
EP - 227
JO - Social neuroscience
JF - Social neuroscience
IS - 3
ER -