TY - JOUR
T1 - Neural signatures of inhibitory control in bilingual spoken production
AU - Rossi, Eleonora
AU - Newman, Sharlene
AU - Kroll, Judith F.
AU - Diaz, Michele T.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research and writing of this manuscript was supported by NIH grants HD053146 and HD082796 and NSF grants OISE-1545900 , and BCS-1535124 to JFK, NIH AG034138 to MTD, and from the Social, Life, and Engineering Sciences Imaging Center at Penn State University. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.
Funding Information:
This research and writing of this manuscript was supported by NIH grants HD053146 and HD082796 and NSF grants OISE-1545900, and BCS-1535124 to JFK, NIH AG034138 to MTD, and from the Social, Life, and Engineering Sciences Imaging Center at Penn State University. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - Bilinguals activate both languages when they intend to speak even one language alone (e.g., Kroll, Bobb, & Wodniekca, 2006). At the same time, they are able to select the language they intend to speak and switch back and forth between languages rapidly, with few production errors. Previous research utilizing behavioral (Linck, Kroll, & Sunderman, 2009) and neuroimaging techniques (ERPs and fMRI; Guo, Liu, Misra, & Kroll, 2011; Misra, Guo, Bobb, & Kroll, 2012) suggest that successful bilingual speech production is enabled by active inhibition of the language not in use. Results showing an asymmetric switching cost for the L1 compared to the L2 (with a larger cost -reflected in longer naming latencies-when switching from the L2 to the L1) have been taken as evidence that the L1 (usually the dominant language for bilinguals who learned their second language later in life) may need to be inhibited when speaking in the L2. However, there is still little research on the scope of this inhibitory process. The goal of this event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study is to understand how the recruitment of neural areas implicated during bilingual language processing are shaped by the scope of language use. The results show that bilinguals engage a wide functional control network that is hierarchically engaged in local control for single lexical items, but extends further to the broader semantic level, and finally to the whole language. This functional network is modulated by proficiency in the L2.
AB - Bilinguals activate both languages when they intend to speak even one language alone (e.g., Kroll, Bobb, & Wodniekca, 2006). At the same time, they are able to select the language they intend to speak and switch back and forth between languages rapidly, with few production errors. Previous research utilizing behavioral (Linck, Kroll, & Sunderman, 2009) and neuroimaging techniques (ERPs and fMRI; Guo, Liu, Misra, & Kroll, 2011; Misra, Guo, Bobb, & Kroll, 2012) suggest that successful bilingual speech production is enabled by active inhibition of the language not in use. Results showing an asymmetric switching cost for the L1 compared to the L2 (with a larger cost -reflected in longer naming latencies-when switching from the L2 to the L1) have been taken as evidence that the L1 (usually the dominant language for bilinguals who learned their second language later in life) may need to be inhibited when speaking in the L2. However, there is still little research on the scope of this inhibitory process. The goal of this event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study is to understand how the recruitment of neural areas implicated during bilingual language processing are shaped by the scope of language use. The results show that bilinguals engage a wide functional control network that is hierarchically engaged in local control for single lexical items, but extends further to the broader semantic level, and finally to the whole language. This functional network is modulated by proficiency in the L2.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051640382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051640382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.009
DO - 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 30130633
AN - SCOPUS:85051640382
SN - 0010-9452
VL - 108
SP - 50
EP - 66
JO - Cortex
JF - Cortex
ER -