TY - JOUR
T1 - Neurocognitive characterizations of Russian heroin addicts without a significant history of other drug use
AU - Fishbein, Diana H.
AU - Krupitsky, Evgeny
AU - Flannery, Barbara A.
AU - Langevin, Doris J.
AU - Bobashev, Georgiy
AU - Verbitskaya, Elena
AU - Augustine, Cynthia B.
AU - Bolla, Karen I.
AU - Zvartau, Edwin
AU - Schech, Barry
AU - Egorova, Valentina
AU - Bushara, Natali
AU - Tsoy, Marina
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to express our gratitude for the critical contributions of our support staff in both Russia and the United States, as well as the U.S. Civilian Research and Development Foundation, the organization that mediated transactions between the US and Russia. Funding for this study was provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (#1 R01 DA15528-01A1).
PY - 2007/9/6
Y1 - 2007/9/6
N2 - Research on the neurocognitive characteristics of heroin addiction is sparse and studies that do exist include polydrug abusers; thus, they are unable to distinguish neurocognitive effects of heroin from those of other drugs. To identify neurocognitive correlates specific to heroin addiction, the present study was conducted in St. Petersburg, Russia where individuals typically abuse and/or become addicted to only one substance, generally alcohol or heroin. Heroin addicts were recruited from an inpatient treatment facility in St. Petersburg. Three comparison groups included alcoholics, addicts who used both alcohol and heroin, and non-abusers. Psychiatric, background, and drug history evaluations were administered after detoxification to screen for exclusion criteria and characterize the sample. Executive Cognitive Functions (ECF) that largely activate areas of the prefrontal cortex and its circuitry measured include complex visual pattern recognition (Paired Associates Learning), working memory (Delayed Matching to Sample), problem solving (Stockings of Cambridge), executive decision making (Cambridge Decision Making Task), cognitive flexibility (Stroop Color-Word Task) and response shifting (Stop Change Task). In many respects, the heroin addicts were similar to alcohol and alcohol + heroin dependent groups in neurocognitive deficits relative to controls. The primary finding was that heroin addicts exhibited significantly more disadvantageous decision making and longer deliberation times while making risky decisions than the other groups. Because the nature and degree of recovery from drug abuse are likely a function of the type or pattern of neurocognitive impairment, differential drug effects must be considered.
AB - Research on the neurocognitive characteristics of heroin addiction is sparse and studies that do exist include polydrug abusers; thus, they are unable to distinguish neurocognitive effects of heroin from those of other drugs. To identify neurocognitive correlates specific to heroin addiction, the present study was conducted in St. Petersburg, Russia where individuals typically abuse and/or become addicted to only one substance, generally alcohol or heroin. Heroin addicts were recruited from an inpatient treatment facility in St. Petersburg. Three comparison groups included alcoholics, addicts who used both alcohol and heroin, and non-abusers. Psychiatric, background, and drug history evaluations were administered after detoxification to screen for exclusion criteria and characterize the sample. Executive Cognitive Functions (ECF) that largely activate areas of the prefrontal cortex and its circuitry measured include complex visual pattern recognition (Paired Associates Learning), working memory (Delayed Matching to Sample), problem solving (Stockings of Cambridge), executive decision making (Cambridge Decision Making Task), cognitive flexibility (Stroop Color-Word Task) and response shifting (Stop Change Task). In many respects, the heroin addicts were similar to alcohol and alcohol + heroin dependent groups in neurocognitive deficits relative to controls. The primary finding was that heroin addicts exhibited significantly more disadvantageous decision making and longer deliberation times while making risky decisions than the other groups. Because the nature and degree of recovery from drug abuse are likely a function of the type or pattern of neurocognitive impairment, differential drug effects must be considered.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250790594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250790594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.02.015
DO - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.02.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 17382488
AN - SCOPUS:34250790594
SN - 0376-8716
VL - 90
SP - 25
EP - 38
JO - Drug and alcohol dependence
JF - Drug and alcohol dependence
IS - 1
ER -