TY - JOUR
T1 - Nonsurgical Strategies to Reduce Mortality in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
T2 - An Updated Consensus Process
AU - Landoni, Giovanni
AU - Lomivorotov, Vladimir
AU - Silvietti, Simona
AU - Nigro Neto, Caetano
AU - Pisano, Antonio
AU - Alvaro, Gabriele
AU - Hajjar, Ludmilla Abrahao
AU - Paternoster, Gianluca
AU - Riha, Hynek
AU - Monaco, Fabrizio
AU - Szekely, Andrea
AU - Lembo, Rosalba
AU - Aslan, Nesrin A.
AU - Affronti, Giovanni
AU - Likhvantsev, Valery
AU - Amarelli, Cristiano
AU - Fominskiy, Evgeny
AU - Baiardo Redaelli, Martina
AU - Putzu, Alessandro
AU - Baiocchi, Massimo
AU - Ma, Jun
AU - Bono, Giuseppe
AU - Camarda, Valentina
AU - Covello, Remo Daniel
AU - Di Tomasso, Nora
AU - Labonia, Miriam
AU - Leggieri, Carlo
AU - Lobreglio, Rosetta
AU - Monti, Giacomo
AU - Mura, Paolo
AU - Scandroglio, Anna Mara
AU - Pasero, Daniela
AU - Turi, Stefano
AU - Roasio, Agostino
AU - Votta, Carmine D.
AU - Saporito, Emanuela
AU - Riefolo, Claudio
AU - Sartini, Chiara
AU - Brazzi, Luca
AU - Bellomo, Rinaldo
AU - Zangrillo, Alberto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Objective: A careful choice of perioperative care strategies is pivotal to improve survival in cardiac surgery. However, there is no general agreement or particular attention to which nonsurgical interventions can reduce mortality in this setting. The authors sought to address this issue with a consensus-based approach. Design: A systematic review of the literature followed by a consensus-based voting process. Setting: A web-based international consensus conference. Participants: More than 400 physicians from 52 countries participated in this web-based consensus conference. Interventions: The authors identified all studies published in peer-reviewed journals that reported on interventions with a statistically significant effect on mortality in the setting of cardiac surgery through a systematic Medline/PubMed search and contacts with experts. These studies were discussed during a consensus meeting and those considered eligible for inclusion in this study were voted on by clinicians worldwide. Measurements and Main Results: Eleven interventions finally were selected: 10 were shown to reduce mortality (aspirin, glycemic control, high-volume surgeons, prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump, levosimendan, leuko-depleted red blood cells transfusion, noninvasive ventilation, tranexamic acid, vacuum-assisted closure, and volatile agents), whereas 1 (aprotinin) increased mortality. A significant difference in the percentages of agreement among different countries and a variable gap between agreement and clinical practice were found for most of the interventions. Conclusions: This updated consensus process identified 11 nonsurgical interventions with possible survival implications for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This list of interventions may help cardiac anesthesiologists and intensivists worldwide in their daily clinical practice and can contribute to direct future research in the field.
AB - Objective: A careful choice of perioperative care strategies is pivotal to improve survival in cardiac surgery. However, there is no general agreement or particular attention to which nonsurgical interventions can reduce mortality in this setting. The authors sought to address this issue with a consensus-based approach. Design: A systematic review of the literature followed by a consensus-based voting process. Setting: A web-based international consensus conference. Participants: More than 400 physicians from 52 countries participated in this web-based consensus conference. Interventions: The authors identified all studies published in peer-reviewed journals that reported on interventions with a statistically significant effect on mortality in the setting of cardiac surgery through a systematic Medline/PubMed search and contacts with experts. These studies were discussed during a consensus meeting and those considered eligible for inclusion in this study were voted on by clinicians worldwide. Measurements and Main Results: Eleven interventions finally were selected: 10 were shown to reduce mortality (aspirin, glycemic control, high-volume surgeons, prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump, levosimendan, leuko-depleted red blood cells transfusion, noninvasive ventilation, tranexamic acid, vacuum-assisted closure, and volatile agents), whereas 1 (aprotinin) increased mortality. A significant difference in the percentages of agreement among different countries and a variable gap between agreement and clinical practice were found for most of the interventions. Conclusions: This updated consensus process identified 11 nonsurgical interventions with possible survival implications for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This list of interventions may help cardiac anesthesiologists and intensivists worldwide in their daily clinical practice and can contribute to direct future research in the field.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033214178&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033214178&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.06.017
DO - 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.06.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 29122431
AN - SCOPUS:85033214178
SN - 1053-0770
VL - 32
SP - 225
EP - 235
JO - Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
JF - Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
IS - 1
ER -