Abstract
In this research note I examine Huntington's 'clash of civilizations' thesis in the light of his arguments to his detractors to apply his thesis to post-Cold War armed conflicts within states. Drawing on more recent data on intrastate armed conflict to 1999, I demonstrate that Huntington's thesis is not substantiated. What we observe is that many of the interethnic and inter-religious conflicts that occur in the post-Cold War era are clashes within rather than between civilizations, just as Huntington's critics have noted previously. In fact, in the post-Cold War era, where there have been changes in the incidence of 'clashes of civilizations' we find that their number has actually declined, if only marginally.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 458-469 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | International Politics |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2005 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Political Science and International Relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Not letting evidence get in the way of assumptions: Testing the clash of civilizations thesis with more recent data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver