TY - JOUR
T1 - NuSTAR Observations of Intrinsically X-Ray Weak Quasar Candidates
T2 - An Obscuration-only Scenario
AU - Wang, Chaojun
AU - Luo, B.
AU - Brandt, W. N.
AU - Alexander, D. M.
AU - Bauer, F. E.
AU - Gallagher, S. C.
AU - Huang, Jian
AU - Liu, Hezhen
AU - Stern, D.
N1 - Funding Information:
C.W. and B.L. acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 11991053 and China Manned Space Project grant Nos. CMS-CSST-2021-A05 and CMS-CSST-2021-A06. W.N.B. acknowledges support from the V. M. Willaman Endowment, NASA grants 80NSSC20K0029 and 80NSSC22K0071, and Penn State ACIS Instrument Team contract SV4-74018 (issued by the Chandra X-ray Center, which is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory for and on behalf of NASA under contract NAS8-03060). F.E.B acknowledges support from ANID-Chile BASAL AFB-170002 and FB210003, FONDECYT Regular 1200495 and 1190818, and Millennium Science Initiative ProgramICN12_009. S.C.G thanks the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Funding Information:
We have made use of data from the NuSTAR mission, a project led by the California Institute of Technology, managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. We thank the NuSTAR Operations, Software, and Calibration teams for support with the execution and analysis of these observations. This research has made use of the NuSTAR Data Analysis Software (NuSTARDAS) jointly developed by the ASI Science Data Center (ASDC, Italy) and the California Institute of Technology (USA).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - We utilize recent NuSTAR observations (co-added depth ≈55-120 ks) of PG 1001+054, PG 1254+047, and PHL 1811 to constrain their hard X-ray (≳5 keV) weakness and spectral shapes and thus to investigate the nature of their extreme X-ray weakness. These quasars showed very weak soft X-ray emission, and they were proposed to be intrinsically X-ray weak, with the X-ray coronae producing weak continuum emission relative to their optical/UV emission. However, the new observations suggest an alternative explanation. The NuSTAR 3-24 keV spectral shapes for PG 1001+054 and PHL 1811 are likely flat (effective power-law photon indices Γeff=1.0-0.6+0.5 and Γeff=1.4-0.7+0.8, respectively), while the shape is nominal for PG 1254+047 (Γeff = 1.8 ± 0.3). PG 1001+054 and PHL 1811 are significantly weak at hard X-ray energies (by factors of ≈26-74 at rest-frame 8 keV) compared to the expectations from their optical/UV emission, while PG 1254+047 is only hard X-ray weak by a factor of ≈3. We suggest that X-ray obscuration is present in all three quasars. We propose that, as an alternative to the intrinsic X-ray weakness + X-ray obscuration scenario, the soft and hard X-ray weakness of these quasars can be uniformly explained under an obscuration-only scenario. This model provides adequate descriptions of the multiepoch soft and hard X-ray data of these quasars, with variable column density and leaked fraction of the partial covering absorber. We suggest that the absorber is the clumpy dust-free wind launched from the accretion disk. These quasars probably have super-Eddington accretion rates that drive powerful and high-density winds.
AB - We utilize recent NuSTAR observations (co-added depth ≈55-120 ks) of PG 1001+054, PG 1254+047, and PHL 1811 to constrain their hard X-ray (≳5 keV) weakness and spectral shapes and thus to investigate the nature of their extreme X-ray weakness. These quasars showed very weak soft X-ray emission, and they were proposed to be intrinsically X-ray weak, with the X-ray coronae producing weak continuum emission relative to their optical/UV emission. However, the new observations suggest an alternative explanation. The NuSTAR 3-24 keV spectral shapes for PG 1001+054 and PHL 1811 are likely flat (effective power-law photon indices Γeff=1.0-0.6+0.5 and Γeff=1.4-0.7+0.8, respectively), while the shape is nominal for PG 1254+047 (Γeff = 1.8 ± 0.3). PG 1001+054 and PHL 1811 are significantly weak at hard X-ray energies (by factors of ≈26-74 at rest-frame 8 keV) compared to the expectations from their optical/UV emission, while PG 1254+047 is only hard X-ray weak by a factor of ≈3. We suggest that X-ray obscuration is present in all three quasars. We propose that, as an alternative to the intrinsic X-ray weakness + X-ray obscuration scenario, the soft and hard X-ray weakness of these quasars can be uniformly explained under an obscuration-only scenario. This model provides adequate descriptions of the multiepoch soft and hard X-ray data of these quasars, with variable column density and leaked fraction of the partial covering absorber. We suggest that the absorber is the clumpy dust-free wind launched from the accretion disk. These quasars probably have super-Eddington accretion rates that drive powerful and high-density winds.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85137819378
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85137819378#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/ac886e
DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/ac886e
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85137819378
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 936
JO - Astrophysical Journal
JF - Astrophysical Journal
IS - 2
M1 - 95
ER -