TY - JOUR
T1 - Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception
AU - Lacey, Simon
AU - Flueckiger, Peter
AU - Stilla, Randall
AU - Lava, Michael
AU - Sathian, K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by research grants from the NIH ( R01 EY12440 and K24 EY17332 to KS, and R01 EB002009 to XH) and NSF ( BCS-0519417 to KS). Support to KS from the Veterans Administration is also gratefully acknowledged.
PY - 2010/2/1
Y1 - 2010/2/1
N2 - Although visual cortical engagement in haptic shape perception is well established, its relationship with visual imagery remains controversial. We addressed this using functional magnetic resonance imaging during separate visual object imagery and haptic shape perception tasks. Two experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, the haptic shape task employed unfamiliar, meaningless objects, whereas familiar objects were used in the second experiment. The activations evoked by visual object imagery overlapped more extensively, and their magnitudes were more correlated, with those evoked during haptic shape perception of familiar, compared to unfamiliar, objects. In the companion paper (Deshpande et al., this issue), we used task-specific functional and effective connectivity analyses to provide convergent evidence: these analyses showed that the neural networks underlying visual imagery were similar to those underlying haptic shape perception of familiar, but not unfamiliar, objects. We conclude that visual object imagery is more closely linked to haptic shape perception when objects are familiar, compared to when they are unfamiliar.
AB - Although visual cortical engagement in haptic shape perception is well established, its relationship with visual imagery remains controversial. We addressed this using functional magnetic resonance imaging during separate visual object imagery and haptic shape perception tasks. Two experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, the haptic shape task employed unfamiliar, meaningless objects, whereas familiar objects were used in the second experiment. The activations evoked by visual object imagery overlapped more extensively, and their magnitudes were more correlated, with those evoked during haptic shape perception of familiar, compared to unfamiliar, objects. In the companion paper (Deshpande et al., this issue), we used task-specific functional and effective connectivity analyses to provide convergent evidence: these analyses showed that the neural networks underlying visual imagery were similar to those underlying haptic shape perception of familiar, but not unfamiliar, objects. We conclude that visual object imagery is more closely linked to haptic shape perception when objects are familiar, compared to when they are unfamiliar.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71849097316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71849097316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.081
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.081
M3 - Article
C2 - 19896540
AN - SCOPUS:71849097316
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 49
SP - 1977
EP - 1990
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
IS - 3
ER -