TY - JOUR
T1 - Offsetable Derivatives and Investor Risk Assessment
AU - Neilson, Jed J.
AU - Wang, K. Philip
AU - Williams, Christopher D.
AU - Xie, Biqin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2023 INFORMS.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) allows banks to offset derivative assets against derivative liabilities with the same counterparty and report only the net amount on the balance sheet. Derivative offsetting under international financial reporting standards (IFRS) is much more restrictive, resulting in the single largest difference in balance sheet presentation between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Two important factors dominate the standard-setting discussion on this issue: (1) whether these derivatives are informative about bank risk and (2) whether disclosing them substitutes for recognition on the balance sheet. Using a hand-collected global sample of banks, we first show that offsetable derivatives are positively associated with bank risk, based on multiple risk measures, suggesting that these derivatives are informative about bank risk. Next, exploiting the differential accounting treatment across U.S. GAAP and IFRS banks, we find that disclosure versus recognition of offsetable derivatives matters for the risk assessment of equity investors but not for that of (more sophisticated) credit default swap investors. Additional tests corroborate the inference that investor sophistication helps explain the differential investor assessment of recognized versus disclosed offsetable derivatives. Collectively, our findings suggest that offsetable derivatives convey information about bank risk and that, for less sophisticated investors, disclosing them may not substitute for recognizing them.
AB - U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) allows banks to offset derivative assets against derivative liabilities with the same counterparty and report only the net amount on the balance sheet. Derivative offsetting under international financial reporting standards (IFRS) is much more restrictive, resulting in the single largest difference in balance sheet presentation between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Two important factors dominate the standard-setting discussion on this issue: (1) whether these derivatives are informative about bank risk and (2) whether disclosing them substitutes for recognition on the balance sheet. Using a hand-collected global sample of banks, we first show that offsetable derivatives are positively associated with bank risk, based on multiple risk measures, suggesting that these derivatives are informative about bank risk. Next, exploiting the differential accounting treatment across U.S. GAAP and IFRS banks, we find that disclosure versus recognition of offsetable derivatives matters for the risk assessment of equity investors but not for that of (more sophisticated) credit default swap investors. Additional tests corroborate the inference that investor sophistication helps explain the differential investor assessment of recognized versus disclosed offsetable derivatives. Collectively, our findings suggest that offsetable derivatives convey information about bank risk and that, for less sophisticated investors, disclosing them may not substitute for recognizing them.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194160971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85194160971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4831
DO - 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4831
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85194160971
SN - 0025-1909
VL - 70
SP - 2779
EP - 2798
JO - Management Science
JF - Management Science
IS - 5
ER -